Ye Are Gods?

Part 1 of 2. (link to Part 2 is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-hsgrCP2Io ).

Introduction. Don't blow a gasket, this isn't the silly Gnostic or Mormon-like idea you've heard elsewhere. It's a real thing, to make "sons of God in Christ Jesus", for God shouldn't have to settle for lesser-thans. Which means, GOD Doing It GOD's WAY. Just as, His Son's Humanity BECAME "The Way, the Truth, and The Life": we will see HIS results, post-death. HIS doing, not ours. It's about the Infinity-finity dichotomy, and how God solves it JURIDICALLY, in order to solve it FUNCTIONALLY: this is explained at length (with verses) in the first section of http://www.brainout.net/LvS4a.htm .

Again, God shouldn't have to settle for lesser-thans. If He can add Humanity to Himself and pay for sins IN that Humanity, then He can bridge the Infinity-finity gap THROUGH that Humanity, aka "in Christ", and put HIMSELF in us. That's what Christ paid for in John 17.

The following videos in this series will be very simple to follow. Idea is to think over Scripture you already well know. Then you'll know how to answer the goofballs who think that John 10:34 is a statement to glorify man. Just the opposite -- it's to GET RID OF our human limitations. Which, obviously only God can do, and -- just as obviously -- we can't see down here, as Hebrews 2 and Romans 8 explain.

Underlying idea is the solution to the Infinity-finity dichotomy: for only if God operates INSIDE us, will it be fair to HIM, to create. This fairness-to-God issue gets no attention in Christianity, but should. How God resolves it, is first covered in http://www.brainout.net/ArchiDes.htm .

Consequently, I wrote the DDNA webseries; it's dedicated to explaining this God-Alone-Does-It transformation. Series begins here: http://www.brainout.net/DDNA.htm .

Category:

Education

Tags:

• John
• 10:36
• sons
• of
• God
• in
• Christ
• Jesus
• NOT
• goofball
• Hindu
• Buddhism
• Mormonism
• claptrap

[brainouty]

@SCORNDOGGMELACH Ooops, I forgot to add something important. When you deal with numbers, it's really important to CLASSIFY their character, and to CATCH all of them. When you do, you get a comprehensive picture where each number snaps into place with an almost-audible 'click'. Everything balances in every direction.

Neither Judaism nor Christianity cares enough to do this balancing. Instead, they rely on past 'scholarship' rather than revisiting BIBLE de novo. That's a stain against us!

[brainouty]

@SCORNDOGGMELACH I don't pay attention to 'the church', either. Just the BIBLE. Everyone else is of no or less authority. So what I told you is just a summary of the BIBLE's accounting, which took me from 2004-2010 to document, 60-hour weeks for the most part.

So the material can be vetted, and shouldn't be accepted absent vetting. Sadly, the vetting will take months, since there are so many Bible verses to compile.

[brainouty]

@SCORNDOGGMELACH Yes, I know their take on Daniel. They are not accounting it rightly. Neither do the Christians. No one is just listening to THE BIBLE, and the Bible completely refutes both sides.

[brainouty]

@SCORNDOGGMELACH Oh, I will listen to them, there is always something to learn. Bear in mind, I'm almost fanatically pro-Jewish. But the arguments against Christ as Messiah employ deceitful or inept scholarship, just like the KJVO arguments. So I won't spend time on them anymore, having already spent decades analyzing and rebutting such stuff.

Still, one doesn't throw out ALL, due to one major set of blunders. Christians would grasp Bible better if they listened to the JEWS!

[SCORNDOGGMELACH]

@brainouty formed by the church. This challenges the compression theory of the verse that is not supported in the origional text. This is of course is an advanced area of study and I admit I had to listen a couple of times to understand it. However you may do better than I with it. You have such an open heart and mind. I on the other hand, tend to bite back when offended and Im working on that. You are a beautiful person inside and out, and I appreciate your honesty and humility.

[SCORNDOGGMELACH]

@brainouty as a whole do not deny your claims concerning chronological and callender problems. However thier take on Daniel 9:24-25 is something to consider. If you find the time to check any of the rest of these lectures out , give that one a listen.WOW! The Rabbi makes two statements in its introduction. One is that it represents one of the most difficult concepts in the Bible to explain as even Daniel was troubled over it, and two ,that it is one of the most exotic transformations(contabove)

[SCORNDOGGMELACH]

@brainouty Thank you for being curtious enough to give these lectures a chance. That is a rare attitude. However I would like to point out that if you continue to check out the rest of the lectures from time to time you will be able to retain something. Though you may not agree,(not sure you are supposed to) you will see HOW the Christian postulate and axiom are so soundly objected to. But the purpose was to re illustrate just how much the text has been manipulated. The Jews however(contabove)

[brainouty]

@SCORNDOGGMELACH Right, I understand. I know some of the people involved in the movement on both sides.

Would that non-Messianic Jews revisited Bible's timeline and original calendar, which got messed up over the centuries: Israel is VINDICATED by that timeline, which proves ONLY Jesus could ever be Messiah. If not Him, there is no one else whose birth and death fits the timeline. So if not Him, there's no Messiah.

Anyone claiming Israel as Suffering Servant is like Riplinger.

[brainouty]

@SCORNDOGGMELACH The lectures are interesting, but frankly they are lax in proper OT hermeneutics, sorry. The Jews forgot how to tell time during the Herods; the Seder Olam Rabbah has never been fixed. If they fixed it to the timeline in the Bible, i.e., as mapped out in Moses' Hebrew Meter and then Isaiah 53's (see my playlists, where I map it, and vid descriptions have even more off-Youtube videos) -- if they revisited those chapters, they'd KNOW Christ is Messiah. No room for doubt.

[brainouty]

@SCORNDOGGMELACH Yes. Channel policy is only to block for anti-semitism and certain other things, like stalking. If you don't want to reply, you don't have to.