Frank Luntz, "It's Not What You Say , It's What They Hear"

Please view the following collection of YouTube videos on Frank Luntz, Republican pollster. i think you will agree that this information reveals a level of corruption and a commitment to the control and manipulation of the American political process. Fox News, their commentators, the FCC along with Frank Luntz and others must be shown for who they really are lest we completely surrender our vote. Freedom is not free. It's time to get involved.

Video 1 (that you are viewing now) FOX NEWS FRAUD - TWICE IN ONE NIGHT (Ron Paul)
produced by *ronpaulreporter*

Video 2 Fox News and Frank Luntz caught with actor at NH debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RMcsJyUT9o

Video 3 Faux News caught using a Plant!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wu1i6GooQY

Video 4 Ex-Journalist, GOP Candidate Show Up in Luntz Focus Group
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC5paDvCdFc

Video 5 Ron Paul Ain't Going Out Like That http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8m6N53nidw

Video 6 Frank Luntz - Ron Paul Rider
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HJaxDt0EbY

Video 7 Ron Paul Being Censored In Telephone Polls
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPpCvF7N3Vg

The following are is Frank Luntz's web site:
http://www.luntz.com/book_overview.html Franks Motto: "It's Not What You Say , It's What They Hear"

The following are comments from his peers:
http://www.hfienberg.com/kesher/2001_12_16_kesher_archive.html This is what his peers think of him: More on the RJC poll of Jewish support for Bush: It has started a small debate on the e-mail list of the American Association of Public Opinion Researchers. Sid Groeneman, of Groeneman Research & Consulting (Bethesda, Maryland), questions the methodology of the poll. I have not looked over the guts of the poll yet (the Republican Jewish Committee just sent me something and I have not had to to check it out yet). But it was conducted by Frank Luntz, who is not well-regarded in profession opinion polling circles. Sid questions how Luntz developed his national sample of Jews. "I've wrestled with this problem for years... there are major problems to be worked out. I'm guessing that Luntz used some form of listed sample. Most lists tend to over-represent those with relatively strong religious identities (and Orthodox Jews). This might help to explain the surprising Republican tilt in the results. Perhaps I'm expecting too much, but it's curious that no one quoted in the story questioned the sampling." Since Luntz does not always share how he does his polls (grumble, snarl), we get to guess. Let me offer another possibility to Sid's. It is possible that Luntz took advantage of the lists of the United Jewish Federation. In looking at how religion affiliations are counted, I found that organizational source data on Jews was usually obtained from UJF lists. I am told that UJF lists are extremely thorough, because they demand to know how to contact every single Jew in America for their fund raising. And certainly UJF does not discriminate between a Jew who thinks himself Orthodox and one who simply feels an ethnic attachment -- they just want the money. Of course, one can argue that that definition is too broad... But perhaps the poll is not as skewed as Sid suggests. As I said, perhaps. I will report back soon with my analysis of the RJC poll.

This last entry is a paper he wrote basically using his talents to manipulate even when it comes to war and human life. http://www.zionism-israel.com/ezine/Explaining_Zionism.htm In 2004 Lunz published a study, " Explaining Zionism I: America 2020 " Frank says:The term "Palestinians" evokes imagery of refugee camps, victims, and oppression. "Arab" says wealth, oil, and Islam. Americans are far more sympathetic to Palestinians than they are to Arabs. Remember, when it was the "Arab-Israeli Conflict"? It still is. Even though the word Palestinian is used repeatedly throughout this document, the more often you can call them Arabs, the less sympathetic the young elites will be.

In conclusion, i feel it is time for a complete overhaul of our campaign election laws.

Thanks, houri

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Debate
• Forum
• Lies
• Corrupt
• Rupert
• Murdoch
• Airpac
• Frank
• Lunz
• Coruption
• Zionism
• JTL
• Republican
• Party
• Fox
• News
• Ron
• Paul

[JULIEGRAY1]

Um... how exactly is anyone "busted"? These were 2 focus groups held months apart in the exact same city (in the exact same diner even)... tracking voter opinion on the exact same candidates. If anyone knows anything about these types of things, it is very common to use the same people to see how opnions have changed. Focus group companies very frequently go back to previous participants to poll them again and see how attitudes have changed-- especially in politics.

[hourilo]

JULIEGRAY1, why is it he asks the same guy questions? Huh? Come on. This was rehearsed with a nod and a handshake.

What you are saying might be useful for a pollster, sure, but it is very misleading to present this to an audience without telling us that he has used these people over and over again. How completely useless . Just meant to manipulate the viewing audience. Thank you Rupert!

[acarlisl]

you know what would actually be fair of FOX?

after the debate, while the candidates are still up on stage and when the audience hasn't left, have someone ask the audience to respond to each candidate by a round of applause to indicate who they thought won. the person with the loudest applause would indicate which candidate won.

instead of having a group of paid actors speak what they are told to say.

[hourilo]

Remember though, the audience is usually stacked too, in favorite of a particular candidate. Also, remember how the YouTube debate with CNN was totally bogus with set up videos and "man-on -the-street" questioners.

It all makes me sick. We need to have major reform.

[toyboatt]

Why is this a "plant"? Who says it cant be the same focus group, no different from a group of economic analysts or sports analysts? Who cares if every singe person is the same? That doesn't mean their opinons are planted. I am voting for Ron Paul, and I don't care for Fox News. But this vidoe doesn't mean anything.

[hourilo]

your profile shows that you are brand new to YouTube and that you have only watched 4 videos. Obviously you didn't not read my words/or view, to the right of the screen or you would have seen all the material that i offer. i can only conclude that your opinion doesn't hold water .

[oldAmtracr]

I think we should start a protest at Frank's place.... let's go let him know what we think of his manipulation of our election process.

Frank Luntz's home address is:

2008 Lorraine Ave

McLean, VA 22101

[TyredUvBS]

ʞuɐɹɟ noʎ ʞɔnɟ

[ILeaveMyLoveWithYou]

probemarket. net is a scam & don't pay. stay far away.

[BillSalem]

Definitely agree that Rupert Murdock should be deported for sedition. He is a totally unsavory human being who hides behind Glenn Beck and the rest of the Faux News loonies and tricksters.

I doubt that Australia would have him back.

[Truthiness231]

Fuck you Frank! (sorry, made a commitment to say that any time I see him or one of his slanted, biased polls)

[meeksmen]

I remember that Rep. debatewhere Paul was excluded, McCain was funny as hell, he sat next to Romney and when Mitt said "I can be the candidate of change", McCain laughed and said "You can be the candidate of change allright, you change your mind every 5 minutes", to which Romney flustered and mad said "You know, these personal barbs are humorous but unnecessary" CLASSIC

[tonewah]

This wasn't the only guy. There were several people who appeared in multiple states on Fox focus groups. One of them was an activist in Florida who helped defeat the recount.

There used to be a lot of videos of the different people, with circles around there heads and short bios. You might be able to find them, still.

[cybmike]

The same bald guy was on tonights focus group!

[JULIEGRAY1]

It's not a different state. If you watched them, (as I did) you'd know that both focus groups were both held at the Merrimack Diner in Manchester New Hampshire. One was after the New Hampshire debate and one was months later, the night before the New Hampshire Primary. If you are gonig to falsely accuse people of something... try to make it something that is not easy to verify.

[JULIEGRAY1]

It's not a different state. If you watched any of them, (as I did) you'd know that both focus groups were both held at the Merrimack Diner in Manchester New Hampshire. One was after the New Hampshire debate and one was months later, the night before the New Hampshire Primary. If you are gonig to falsely accuse people of something... try to make it something that is not easy to verify.