Rob and Rani - Britain's Got Talent vs Doctor Who

The nights after the 2008 Stephen Moffat penned Doctor Who two-parter, Silence In The Library and Forest of The Dead, poster Rob Filth and Mistress Rani from the Doctor Who forum 'The Leisure Hive', discuss its ratings against Britain's Got Talent on ITV

http://leisurehive.informe.com/

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Britain's Got Talent
• Doctor Who
• Rob Filth
• Mistress Rani
• forum
• internet
• Russell T Davies
• RTD
• Steven Moffat
• Primeval
• ratings
• BBC1
• ITV
• science fiction
• television

[SilverArse]

My favourite channel subscription.

[midianholic]

Rob Filth is not that co*ksucker Doc Filth, the seedy looking tool, from OG and Gallifrey base ?

[ZipZagginGallifrey]

@therealKINDLE You wish death on the head writer of a succesful children's show. Yep, all the hallmarks of a jealous chav elitist

[ZALPHA2000]

I don't know who Adrian Hodges is!

[JadesVidz]

@therealKINDLE It is in no way a FACT. I dont care for your arguments, but whatever you say based on your idealistic views of a show is OPINION.

It cant be FACT that the show is rubbish because me and 7 million others love it. Therefore your FACT is proven invalid.

You try suggesting to me Blink and The Doctor's Wife are bad stories.

[therealKINDLE]

@JadesVidz It's a FACT that Moffat is about as comparable to Bob Holmes, as a Turd is to Emerald. You're SERIOUSLY comparing the Likes of Ark in Space, The Deadly Assassin, Talons on Weng Chiang, Terror of Zygons, Seeds of Doom, etc to that awful shit? Are you a Complete Philistine? All Muppet does is write utter bilge, & then suck his own cock for it in Confidential. He thought the Xmas 1 was so good, yet it was the Love Story of a Man & a Boy who were the Same person! Er.. HELLO? "PARADOX?"

[Alexoneil]

@JadesVidz Steven Moffat lacks the basic storytelling ingredients and depth that the original writers of the series had. He is not objective in his storytelling and relies on action and surprise, but never backs up the action with a solid plot. Surprises and twists in classic who were there, yes, BUT there was a reason for them other than to keep the audience utterly confused. I have sat watchign the new stuff for hours and none of it makes any sense if you actually analyse it properly.

[JadesVidz]

@therealKINDLE Oh, and what do you base THAT on?

Your own opinion?

Steven Moffat shares great similarities with the writers of Tom Bakers heyday. Unlike RTD, Moff relies on plot twists and intricate clues throughout a series, instead of emotion and pantomine

THIS is what Doctor Who use to be like. Surprises and twists are what Classic Who was about, aswell as making small objects the stars of nightmares.

Even so, its my own opinion, so don't patronize it as if your opinion is fact.

[therealKINDLE]

@JadesVidz Moffat is a SHIT Writer. What are you going on about? He has KILLED Dr who with his obbsession with Surprises & Twists that don't make any fucking sense. And is just as useless as that Fucking Twat RTD who obviously taught him all the Techniques of Destroying a Great Show.

[therealKINDLE]

Ok! Come on then! When are you going Rip on Steven Fat Face Moffat then? The Wanker who thinks it's right to get the Companions in short Skirts & up the Fucking Duff. Moffat you are a PRICK & you can DIE for all I care.

[firetooth102]

@GeorgeMillerAtkinson i find the new one better and the old

[firetooth102]

i dont want to here about 2 people fighting over what's better my opinion is silence in the library i find the vashtar vanadar aka the darkness better