Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

What's Wrong With the Star Wars Blu-Ray Changes

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,827
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 2, 2011

On NBC Chicago's "The Rundown," Ben Bowman explains to Rob Elgas and Andy Avalos why a change to "Return of the Jedi" is dumb.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @OBIPUGS Are you saying he didn't have the technology to make Vader say, "No" back in '83? Because he did.

  • @OBIPUGS If Lucas wants to keep making changes to his movies, he can do whatever he wants, but RELEASE A FU$%ING trilogy on bluray that is just remastered the audio and image quality. Give us a choice!!

Video Responses

This video is a response to Star Wars Blu-Ray Changes
see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thats not on the br tell me its not?

  • don't mind the ewoks blinking. Y add the whole " Nooo!" Thing. Agree w the guy being interviewed no use at all for this. Just nitpicking and adding extra things. If its not broken dont fix it. I used to think ppl exaggerated but after seeing this clip I agree and think George is a perfectionist. He needs to calm that down a bit. The added CGI jabba scene was also utter crap!!!

  • @Dangeroso He's saying he didn't have the technology for some other changes GL made, which recieve the same amount of hate as this. Think about that next time.

  • Wow... Yeah i think George has a problem, there isn't any reason for that...

  • @Dangeroso There is only about half a dozen changes in this release. If you would like for me to defend the 'no' scene, then I will. The blinking Ewoks make them look more likelike instead of just actors in fur suits.

  • Dear George...you broke my heart.

  • Why am I not suprised?

  • @Discern4 Electricity. But do you know what electrocution means? It's almost always misused by the populace. Electrocution means electric shock resulting in death. So if someone's electrocuted, they're dead. Luke isn't dead (technically or otherwise) while he's being shocked, nor does he die later as a result. He wasn't electrocuted. And no, don't even say I'm getting into semantics because, again, electrocution means electric shock resulting in death. I didn't make the word so don't blame me.

  • @TsugaruClan What was coming out of the emperor's fingertips?

  • His son wasn't being electrocuted. If he was, he'd be dead.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more