Devistating blow to the the evolution of the genetic code

Biophysicist Hubert Yockey has determined that natural selection would have to explore 1.40 x 10^70 different genetic codes to discover the optimal universal genetic code that is found in nature.
He states that the maximum amount of time available for it to originate is 6.3 x 10^15 seconds, and that Natural Selection would have to evaluate roughly 10^55 codes per second to find the one that is optimal, which amount to one trillion times the 15 billion years of the imagined age of the universe for natural Selection to have created the genetic code, and therefore, the genetic code cannot have been produced by evolutionary processes. He states also that the genetic code possesses characteristics which could only have been a product of intelligence.

Information is

1 : the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence

Mutations do not communicate or possess knowledge or intelligence.
...
2 a (1) : knowledge obtained from investigation, study, or instruction

Mutations are random, and to not convey knowledge, which is specific, they do not investigate, study, or instruct. The changes they cause are not instruction because instruction is the communication of specific knowledge. Mutations do not possess or communicate knowledge. Changes to color or pattern caused by mutation are side effects of the corruption of information. Corrupting the code which determines color so that the code produces a different color is not the conveyance or production of information. It's merely a side effect.

(3) : facts, data b : the attribute inherent in and communicated by one of two or more alternative sequences or arrangements of something (as nucleotides in DNA or binary digits in a computer program) that produce specific effects

Mutations do not produce facts or data. Facts and data are specific and produced only by intelligence. Mutations cannot communicate because communication is a process of intelligence. The change to the arrangement of nucleotides caused by mutation is not the communication of facts or data. It is merely corruption, modification of existing information.

c (1) : a signal or character (as in a communication system or computer) representing data
Mutations do not produce signals or characters which represent data. Data is a product of investigation and study which are activities of intelligence. Being random, mutations do not represent anything at all.

(2) : something (as a message, experimental data, or a picture) which justifies change in a construct (as a plan or theory) that represents physical or mental experience or another construct

Mutations do not communicate messages or data. Constructs are products of intelligence.

d : a quantitative measure of the content of information; specifically : a numerical quantity that measures the uncertainty in the outcome of an experiment to be performed

Mutations are random mistakes. They do not measure anything, nor do they convey knowledge. They cause entropy to the genetic code and are the single most important reason that all life on Earth is moving towards extinction. This is the opposite of the antiquated claims of evolutionists that mutation is the base mechanism for evolution and has produced the varieties of life.

Evolutionism is an antiquated concept born in a time when people rode horses and used candles and oil lamps to light their homes. Modern science has discredited evolutionism in every imaginable way, and all new claims of evolutionists are discredited by what is already known in science.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• dna
• genetics
• atheism
• atheist
• hubert
• yockey
• biophysics
• biophysicist
• now
• you
• see
• tv
• nowyouseetv

[gerontodon]

Where can you buy, or otherwise view video in full?

[jpopenyoureyes]

@gerontodon Check out the description it should lead you to the video. Thanks.

[disrxt]

This guy assumes the genetic code is a completely random event. That is a mistake. It is not random it is directed by natural selection. No matter how often this is explained to these people they go back to the same flawed reasoning. DNA is not a language, that is an analogy, this guy knows this, he says so, then goes right back to overusing the analogy, intellectually dishonest.

[jpopenyoureyes]

@disrxt Oh hold everything disrxt knows and is a scientist.. Come on brother he covered that argument you are using. Did you even watch the video or did it go over your head? DNA is something I have studied and I have come to the conclusion based on every study that has been put out by leading scientists that DNA does not evolve because the "evolution" was already programmed into the DNA to begin with. Mutation is not evolution. Don't be so religious with your atheism, you might learn something

[alphaenemy]

Funny. Over a year old, and did nothing to overturn evolution. Denialism? Hardly. It doesn't work, that's why this video didn't overturn evolution. It's religious propaganda using more technical terms, deeper shades of wool to pull over the eyes of its sheep.

[pupspepper]

@jpopenyoureyes i totally agre, the mindset of most people is split in science and spirituality, or more like false religion to control the people. the good old devide and conquer.

although all studies show sth.. the people won't see it, because it's not possible in their programmed reality. to see truth we have to abandon all the believe systems and find to our real selves and truth.

love and truth :)

[IloveYOUviruses]

Fundamental darwinists will make a new model in which mutations aren't deleterious, after all, darwinism isn't about science but faith and name-calling.

[dltanner99]

Alternative view of evolution see video book trailer

[peronkop]

Evolution is not programed into the genome. Evolution is a product of natural selection which the DNA does not have control over. If some DNA dies while others don't its not up to the programing of the DNA to decide. Natural selection works independant on DNA, its an outside source of enviromental pressure that drives generations of species (and their DNA) to change.Mutations are indeed not evolution. Evolution is change over time (where mutation could play a role).

DNA probably DID evolve.

[KellyPosey]

fascinating. thanks for sharing

[GravDiga]

blood*

[GravDiga]

@jpopenyoureyes Umm, i am not a scientist.. or very smart, but judging from that comment you sound like an idiot.

isn't growing up a form of evolution..in simple terms, so doesn't your DNA mutate too with time as you grow.......

humans are mutants...so our bloods must have evolved.