How to prove Pytharoras'Theorem

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
45,446
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 3, 2007

A short video showing how I think Pythagoras proved the theorem that bears his name.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ukbraintrainer)

  • Sorry, but your initial proof didn't proove a damn thing, you just replaced the the "L" sketch with two non-proven-to-be squares, and who claims for them to be the same squares as in the original example?

    Didn't follow you on the second try, but here's an easy proof: imagine the blue triangle and the C square both inscribed in one large square. It's border is a+b, so the surface area is (a+b)², equal to the four triangles plus C, meaning 4·½ab+c², will lead you to a²+b²=c².

  • No. You're wrong. The proof is perfectly robust. You may need to follow it a couple of times before you get it.

  • Did you appropriate this demonstration from Jacob Bronowski's 'Music of the Spheres' episode from his Ascent Of Man?

  • I was very strongly influenced by the entire TV series. The geometrical part of the proof is very much influenced. The algebraic part (from 3.40 onward) is unique as far as I know, but is based on the geometrical proof.

Top Comments

  • for everyday people they can get by with just knowing the formula and plug in numbers. for university/college students who study math/physics it's good to understand every formula you're using so you can perhaps figure out a solution to problems that aren't so straight forward. It also helps develop critical thinking skills.

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I think you're right Michael; Pythagoras' method is as you illustrated. Messy calculations usually tells me I'm doing something wrong.

  • Why is the title pytharoras?

  • @feedtherich isn't it just a-b because the side of the larger triangles have sides a and b by supposition. So for one side of the pink square, just subtract the short side of the grey triangle from the long side of the green triangle.

  • sounds like young george harrison and john. They are two of the four Beatles, as if you didn't know.

  • squäääää

  • Uh, but how did he get the area of the pink square? I mean we know it's true, but how do we know it's true? That's what the proof is supposed to provide.

  • @ukbraintrainer

    Yeah the initial proof is robust, but you don't explain WHY you can cover the L-shaped region with the two brown squares of area a^2 and b^2. But that's easy enough to remedy when you show that the small purple square has a side length of (b-a) and then use that to show the L-shaped region can be divided into two squares of area a^2 and b^2. I can sympathize with deadlybug because this wasn't explicitly shown but the proof CAN be made to work.

  • or if youre a dumbass like me...zippo lighters and party hats!

  • First time I see Mathematics in English! Very nice! (I'm Brazillian)

    I love Pythagoras' Theorem!

    I've made a presentation about it, maybe I'll upload a video soon...

  • Thumbs up! This is the first complete proof i've seen that is ultra trivial! great stuff!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more