ufo confirmation documentary pt 3

UFO - Confirmation The Hard Evidence Are We Alone (NBC 1999).

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• ufo
• alien
• space
• science
• evidence
• universe

[MobiusBandwidth]

why does everyone say Kenneth Arnold saw 9 disc shaped objects, he did not describe them as disc shaped, they were a bit more like boomerangs, their motion reminded him of discs skipping across water, which is where we got the term flying saucer, but he never said they were disc or saucer shaped. know your history.

[Vilepop89]

There doesn't actually seem to be any "hard" evidence in this video. All of them are sightings, claims, videos or images. All the sightings are not 'evidence'. they are opinions or claims which could mean anything or be made up. the videos and images are not hard evidence either. Hard evidence is "physical" evidence

[Joeyjumpoff1]

kobe doin work

[tb7la]

That's 100gs, watch again and than some.

[hyperdriveguitar]

I dont think it is a misslie I think it is laser defence tech.

So what is the speed of light?

186,282.39560 miles per second.

This would make sense then.

[tch2296]

Yeah, I guess that is what he meant

[Sansash01202]

Do you think maybe he meant it was well beyond anything we can fly in on earth - you don't fly in a missile?

[tch2296]

Okay, this guy who worked for "Star Wars Defense" has debunked his own damn theory.

First, he claims (a bit before 1:30) that the object moves at an acceleration of 25g's, "well beyond anything we can achieve on earth", and then in the next breath, he actually puts forth the argument that the "missile" that streaks by the object, going 10x faster, could be an earth-borne defense system.

Pathetic. Shot down his own credibility.

if we can't achieve

[scottiboi08]

more bread