Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Top 10 Moments in Doctor Who History #5

Here's #5! Warning: new series bashing ahead!  
 
Customize

More From: TheBigBlueBox

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
12 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,275 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (20)   Options

Loading...
holmegab (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Chan won't you please take some rest tho...makes me wonder how much Chantho really knew!
mbeswick (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This is a terrific compilation of clips and a very enjoyable analysis. Cheers.
Whaqtraxrecords (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I like Simm's Master but it would have been good to see Jacobi's Master a bit more.
LilyKnotwise (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I really liked John Simm's version. The thing with John Simm's Master was that it was so radically different from the original classic Who Masters. Not only is his personality and "look" different, but also his "type" of evilness. He was pushed right over the edge of insanity and that changed everything, and it's plausible that his personality took such a serious turn. Just because he's different, doesn't mean he's a bad Master. Just look at how different the Doctor's regenerations are.
JadesVidz (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I loved John Simm as the master!
I believe he is a great actor and performed the part very well. He was comic, yes, but that worked perfectly with the idea that he is a villianous, evil, insane man and his 'joker' presence set fear into those he captured. The revived series gets 'bashed' by many older generation fans far to much, I credit it, I believe it is a mix of great Plots, Great characters and even an introduced humor that has attracted new audiences young and old. I applaud RTD.
TheBigBlueBox (4 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
So you think there was no humor in the classic series,... that it was RTD that introduced humor to Doctor Who. You couldn't be more wrong... Watch The Time Warrior, City of Death, the Pirate Planet, and pretty much anything with Tom Baker if you don't believe me...
JadesVidz (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes I knew of the humor in general ('Do You Want A Jelly Baby!') but as a whole when you speak of the humor in the revived series, you speak negatively of it. From what I have seen of Tom Bakers episodes, the humor is more plentiful in 2006 +, and you seem to be critisising that. By the way, I havent actually lived long enough to see ALL the classics, but Tom Baker Repeats have entertained me, they are very good and funny yes, but after and before him humor did not play a big part in classics.
TheBigBlueBox (4 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
You're wrong that there's any more humor in the new series then there was in the classic. It's the manner of humor that's different. The classic series humor was done in the great tradition of Douglas Adams with some mild Monty Python thrown in at times. The new series relies on juvenile humor such as burping garbage bins and farting aliens.
JadesVidz (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No infact those paticular 'jokes' are more intended for younger viewers, the shows humor is mostly played out as clever lines, (aka Journeys end when there were '3' doctors and jack says ''I cant say what Im thinking right now'') That is both clever and discrete, primarily for adult viewers and something younger viewers will not understand. It is suited for everyone.
angelarowlands (6 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
i agree with ShootStlyeZombie

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.