Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I really liked John Simm's version. The thing with John Simm's Master was that it was so radically different from the original classic Who Masters. Not only is his personality and "look" different, but also his "type" of evilness. He was pushed right over the edge of insanity and that changed everything, and it's plausible that his personality took such a serious turn. Just because he's different, doesn't mean he's a bad Master. Just look at how different the Doctor's regenerations are.
I loved John Simm as the master! I believe he is a great actor and performed the part very well. He was comic, yes, but that worked perfectly with the idea that he is a villianous, evil, insane man and his 'joker' presence set fear into those he captured. The revived series gets 'bashed' by many older generation fans far to much, I credit it, I believe it is a mix of great Plots, Great characters and even an introduced humor that has attracted new audiences young and old. I applaud RTD.
So you think there was no humor in the classic series,... that it was RTD that introduced humor to Doctor Who. You couldn't be more wrong... Watch The Time Warrior, City of Death, the Pirate Planet, and pretty much anything with Tom Baker if you don't believe me...
Yes I knew of the humor in general ('Do You Want A Jelly Baby!') but as a whole when you speak of the humor in the revived series, you speak negatively of it. From what I have seen of Tom Bakers episodes, the humor is more plentiful in 2006 +, and you seem to be critisising that. By the way, I havent actually lived long enough to see ALL the classics, but Tom Baker Repeats have entertained me, they are very good and funny yes, but after and before him humor did not play a big part in classics.
You're wrong that there's any more humor in the new series then there was in the classic. It's the manner of humor that's different. The classic series humor was done in the great tradition of Douglas Adams with some mild Monty Python thrown in at times. The new series relies on juvenile humor such as burping garbage bins and farting aliens.
No infact those paticular 'jokes' are more intended for younger viewers, the shows humor is mostly played out as clever lines, (aka Journeys end when there were '3' doctors and jack says ''I cant say what Im thinking right now'') That is both clever and discrete, primarily for adult viewers and something younger viewers will not understand. It is suited for everyone.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I believe he is a great actor and performed the part very well. He was comic, yes, but that worked perfectly with the idea that he is a villianous, evil, insane man and his 'joker' presence set fear into those he captured. The revived series gets 'bashed' by many older generation fans far to much, I credit it, I believe it is a mix of great Plots, Great characters and even an introduced humor that has attracted new audiences young and old. I applaud RTD.