Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Chi energy revealed!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
250,147
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 28, 2009

If you didnt know it was a a scam would you accept the video as an example of pyrokinetic power? www.scienceofscams.com

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 335 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • this so called scientist are nothing but narrowminded, they do not posses the metaphisical thinking, of course the man in the video was nothing but sore looser trying to prove their point, and they choose theyr video acordingly, so they can come up with a so called theory.Of course those chemicals can ignite the paper, but what if you meet a real qi gong master that can in fact ignite a paper without any chemical, only energy, cause energy does exist.trying to deny it it`s just dumb

  • ive seen better fakes than this but im still believing in chi :D

    you guys are just dumbasses

see all

All Comments (1,382)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • For everyone that is angry at this video, as yourself what is the reason for this anger? There are tricksters out there and this helps you spot them. Why not get the Chi masters to not use crumbled paper? Or just burn a plank of wood? He is not saying there is no Chi energy manipulation, he's just saying that sometimes people ARE tricking you.

  • @howhighnick Hey the next time you see a Qui gong master or whatever do this, then it's simple just check the newspaper, if there are no chemicals there then you have yourself a master, if there are chemicals then you have yourself a trickster! Simple!

  • These guys are nothing but buzz kills...so what if its fake or real...let them have their moment..jackasses!!

  • Lol Dumb asses... Where's the proof???? Chi is definitely real as is Pyrokinesis

  • I love this fatass.  Thanks for protecting Yin Ki for me personally. You're makin my life easier

  • @youwish44lulz yeah, but 1. We lack scientific discourse about possible methodologies of research, 2. negating the possible scams wont serve 1. So this doesnt help much. We need sth fully different.

  • @Fendefadst soory for some mis-spellings, its not my mothertongue but my third one, after ANYTHING it ís: if proof is reduced. i am speaking about the 3 strands of science laid out by Popper. But well, as Scientifically minded people its certain that you know, right ; )

  • look, I ould tell this unhealthy looking fatty had not been going through years of training BY SIGHT. Plus: I can proove airplanes cant fly, I can proof you dont exist, I can proof ANYTHING is proof is reduced to the falsification aspect only, leaving out injunction and data. So perform aspects with injunction, datagathering and than falsification BY a COMMUNITY of adequates, like, you know, SCIENCE(should you ever have hehard about it), and than we can can talk

  • fatass needs to unclog all that fat to actually feel his chi energy..lol

  • you just give 2 example and call Chi energy a scam! There is still too much you dont know about Chi energy.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more