EXCELLENT Analysis of the North Tower Exploding
Top Comments
All Comments (140)
-
Wow so funny this video contradicts so many other twoofer stances. It is clearly falling hundreds of feet outside its own footprint.
No explosives were heard/seen.. this is all kind of stupid to make it something it clearly isn't.
Science behind the failures:
"civil.northwestern.e du/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/4
05.p df" (remove xtra spaces) Looks like Chandler is wrong watch?v=9SSS0DDqfm0
-
@feelthewyrd The ejections are NOT falling...They are shooting 100 feet into the air and out before finally coming down....some of those ejections travel over 1 1/2 blocks.
GRAVITYS ONLY DIRECTION IS DOWN...so anything that goes up and out has force behind it. This is 5th grade level. Its not all that hard to understand
-
@MrRiktheDik i like how you ask for common sense then declare slapping a bag to a building coming down
-
Its funny u people tht hate USA""or on a American site. tht made McDonald's are all around the world :) the website ur on called' YouTube, and much more hahaha I luv America
-
@deathmetalhippy Put a wall between your face and the "clapping area", now clap your hands, will the wall explode in your face?
But let's change question as you suggest, ok? Why didn't they stop the planes? They can intercept a plane in 10 minutes if it's heading to the white house (happened before, remember?) but they did nothing on 9/11.
Visit NORAD site, read the explanation of what technology they have, read about what they could do, now ask yourself why they didn't do it.
-
@deathmetalhippy Put some walls around your experiment, will the dust break thru and throw away the wall into pieces or will it just stop cause of its resistance?
Now use explosives and tell me if the walls behave differently, just take your distance before starting this second experiment will ya?
-
@Troller94 Ok, thank you, let me get this straight will you?
What are you saying is that in the short time between the planes crashes and the buildings collapse they sent in some agents to plant explosives on all floors and then ignite it, right?
That's some terrific strategy. Thank you for such a contribution.
It takes something like 10 minutes to bomb down two 100 floors building, that's some teamwork in action isn't it?
Oh, nevermind... I noticed your user name...
-
All you NWO-Traitors, Illuminati, Skull&Bones, BilderBergs, Freemasons, Rockefellers and Rothschilds gonna be justed and be held responsible for this. You will repent. Pray for forgiveness. Jesus is the way!
You even see debris going upwards haha. Well, I can´t understand why this discussion continues. If you can´t see the obvious explosive collaps, you are one of the following:
1. Blind
2. Retarded
3. Mentally screwed
4. Dis-info agent
The debate is over...
alienspacecentereast 2 years ago 13
@dgl1962 DG, I question the collapse as do many others much more intelligent than myself.
I agree with you that heating steel will reduce structural integrity but would that have caused a systemic, symetrical collapse at near freefall speeds? Would there be enough kinetic energy to create pools of molten metal weeks after collapse? What force pulverizes concrete in midair? Fire and pancaking is an insult to those that died and a far cry from the truth. As you stated earlier,"...very fishy."
dreamwhileyousleep 1 year ago 9