Creation Science Model proves Creation is real!

A very good Creation Science Model or CSM
as I like to call it ;)

Here is a review of the book form Amazon.com by a user
that gave the book 5 stars from http://www.amazon.com/Creation-Science-Henry-Madison-Morris/product-reviews/0...

By Jerry Davis "Engineer, Writer, Christian" (San Antonio, TX) "This review is from: What Is Creation Science (Paperback)
I read this book in 1991, and it changed my entire mindset regarding evolution. Just that morning I laughed at my best friend because he thought Creationism was science. At the time, I waa a hardened evolutionist, and essentially athiest. But I made an agreement with him to study the matter and talk again.

That afternoon, as I walked into the fourth floor of my University library to study, there was "What Is Creation Science" on the go-back shelf, right at eye level. Amazing coincidence.

So I picked up the book, went into my private study room, and nine hours later, finished the book. I began reading it a staunch evolutionist with a great reputation in the biology department as a premier student of science. I finished this book a convinced creationist, and I have never wavered from that change.

The most utterly convincing arguments for creation are in the geologic record. Amazing truths, just amazing stuff. "Hydraulic geologic shock" is a phrase from the book that I will remember until I die. Buy the book and read it. You'll love it. Plus, once you intellectually understand the creation arguments, everything seems to snap into focus. Things "make sense" regarding Genesis, time lines, age of earth. It radically changed my life for the better.

Evolution is a pitiful joke. It's just utter nonsense, and most scientists who speak positively of evolution do so because they are paralyzed with fear of arguing against their peers. They are afraid to fair mindedly examine the evidence, because they want to be considered "smart" and part of the intellectual elite (which exists in their own mind). Plus, most scientists are unbelievers in God, Jesus Christ as diety, and the Bible in general. Evolution specifically does that to people. It denys God.

Pride, then, is the enemy of great science, which is a damnable pity because we need the best answers we can get. Evolution is a virus in the scientific community that kills intellectual freedom to know the truth.

Study creationism. Read the best arguments for creationism, and if you have the guts to say "This, if true, means a young earth and a creator", you will be on your way to a whole new life, I assure you. You'll look at everything with new eyes, and answers will jump out at you. Go. Do it. You will always be glad you did. "

Very good review and I feel the same way about it ;)

Other tags: God Jesus Christ the Bible athiesm atheist
Christian Creationism Intelligent Design evolution science
abiogenesis biogenesis the 2nd law of thermodynamics biology theories hypothesis debate Gary E. Parker Henry M. Morris Carl Sagan Richard Dawkins youtube google

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Creation
• Science
• Model
• God
• Jesus
• Christ
• the
• Bible
• athiesm
• atheist
• Christian
• Creationism
• Intelligent
• Design
• evolution
• scienceabiogenesis
• biogenesis
• 2nd
• law
• of
• thermodynamics
• biology
• theories
• hypothesis
• debate
• Gary
• E.
• Parker
• Henry
• M.
• Morris
• Carl
• Sagan
• Richard
• Dawkins
• youtube
• google
• atheism
• philosophy

[AAL]

"imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in - an interesting hole I find myself in - fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' D. Adams

[4thcoming]

@AAL lol.

[Reunakk]

There's no such thing as a "creation science model" because creationism is both uscientific and untrue.

[dclaver2]

Well 7 days could be god days, it doesn't really mean 24 hours for 7 days, 7 days could be 7 seconds, 7 days could be 7000 years, 7 days could be 500 million years. God could have created the world, and then evolution took its part. The bible does focus on only one part of the world, so Adam couldn't have named every single animal, and Noah couldn't have gathered every single one.

Also, if god created the first man and woman, it doesn't prove race.

[saiyanmage]

If that's a very good creation science model then I don't even need to answer this.

[JAB63096]

Why is it that you don't find dinosaurs in the same layer of Earth as humans or them as trilobites? Not one fossils has EVER been found out of place of what evolution says it would be found.

[gregrutz]

Here is the evidence, the facts, go look. The fossils are layered like this: In the bottom layer of rock are shell fossils, above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian, reptile fossils and dinosaur fossils. No human or bunny fossils are found in any of these layers. No dating method used

[speakoftheunknown]

There is not one accurate statement in this video

[0oknm]

Thats i bunch of bull crap!!!!

[brewerbrian420]

I love how the evidence for Creation Science is always TRYING to disprove REAL SCIENCE. They never have any valid evidence. They just bash evolution, the big bang, abiogenesis, and other logically/rationally thought out theories. But never provide any facts as to why its wrong or why they are right. Do you people ever bring forth evidence to support your nonsense, I would be glad to look, as would many other people. Because if there were evidence we would be inclined to believe.

[MoneyfreeSociety]

Lmao, "hydraulic geologic shock"?! That does sound like creationist science! I bet I could make one up: "aerodynamic atmospheric rush" Lmfao!!!

[tomaselvis]

Waste of time...