Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Lycoming-powered Diamond DA42 Demo

Aviation Consumer and AVweb report on the new Diamond DA42 L360, powered by a pair of Lycoming IO-360 engines.  
 
Customize

More From: AVweb

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
16 ratings
Sign in to rate
9,890 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (18)   Options

Loading...
100LL81 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Did he say 10.8 GPH per side?? He was talking about climb rates just before, was the 10.8 in a climb. I am assuming.
Nemesisnxt (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Wow, your O-360s only burned 5.5 gph each? Impressive considering my O-200 burns 4.5gph at cruise. Lycoming published specs say that best comsumption is .43 lb/Hp-hr which translates to approx 11.5 gph. I'm very sure they are talking about 10.8gph a side at a high power cruise.
Nemesisnxt (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
oops, bad math, I figured it at Jet-A weight. Habbit. Its actually 12.85gph for avgas @ 6.02lbs.
nicoacuorg (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The Twin Comanche has O-320's not 360's, which accounts for the lower fuel flow. My calculations were not by guage or fuel flow meter, which was not really reliable, but I calculated total time flown and total gals to fill up. That gave me an overall fule burn rate. One more thing: we used imperial gallons, which is 4.5 litres and not US gals, which is 3.85 litres, so I will show a much lower gph.
nicoacuorg (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
At about 10K feet the MP is under 20" which is under 55% power. I still clocked 160kts depending on winds aloft. At that power setting it's no wonder that my figures differ from a 75% setting at low altitudes.
nicoacuorg (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Where can one see your video. I have fond memories of a friend who owned a Mooney with the hand operated gear lever. Fastest retraction in the sky.
sksakm14 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I didn't notice that you had replied to my post cause I didn't get the normal email. If you haven't found it already and are still interested you just click on my profile name and watch it on my profile.
sksakm14 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Oh, and Twin Comanche's have IO-320's if I'm not mistaken. 160 hp (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here). The L360 has, as the 360 suggests, Lycoming IO-360M1A's.
nicoacuorg (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You are right it has 320's not 360's. I was mistaken and already apologized to Paul for the mistake.
sksakm14 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It's fine man, I was just trying to point out that perhaps the DA42 would burn a bit more than a Twin Comanche, although I'm sure that if you throttled back quite a ways that you could get 5.4 gph per engine and by nature of the newer, most likely more efficient design, you could probably get about the same speed even though you were in a heavier aircraft (I believe the Twin Comanche is 3725 gross and that the L360 version of the Twin Star is 3968).

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.