Reactor Vs. Mass Fx (Full Comparison) HD

Finally we composed our full comparison between Reactor (Havok engine) and Mass Fx (Physix). Hopefully this was insightful ;)

Music by Xtrullor:
http://soundcloud.com/xtrullor

----------------------------------------------------------------

OUR TWITTER : http://twitter.com/aurorabytes

OUR FACEBOOK: http://www.aurorabytes.de/facebook

WEBSITE: http://www.aurorabytes.de/

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Reactor
• Version
• Mass
• Fx
• MassFx
• Animation
• Aurora-Bytes
• Aurora
• Bytes
• 3d
• animation
• 3ds
• max
• Autodesk
• Martin
• Amadeus
• Animated
• havok
• engine
• bricks
• glass
• teapot
• versus
• vs
• vs.
• physX
• full
• comparison
• After
• Effects
• dupstep
• dup
• step
• dubstep
• dub
• xtrullor

[karvak1492]

I uninstall my 3DS MAX 2012 because the Havoc reactor in 3DS MAX 2011 are better. Look @ my video 4 example. All this was created with 3DS MAX 2011 Havoc engnine, except the gyrochain video.

[karvak1492]

Mass FX is goog for simulations look like WTC 9/11 :) but Havoc is the best for precision mechanical simulations. My appinion is the 3DS MAX 2011 Havoc engine is the best.

[SirHVillagran]

Well, as I understand it there is more involvement between Nvidia and Autodesk as their collaboration grows in time. Thus, o course Autodesk will choose a "partner" over another developer for business purposes.

I feel like massfx is more snappy than reactor though. I guess this translates into a more physically correct simulation given the objects values but I do miss the increased features of the reactor engine.

[XMTsync]

too bad they didn't let you choose which physics solver you wanted.

[mrcarbine541]

hate the way they removed Reactor :(