Rough introduction to the FCS Future Combat System prototype that was used to help create the experimental video images shown on 9/11 to shock and awe the world.
On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.
The forensic analysis of the LIVE TV images leaves no room for doubt : they do not depict authentic imagery nor real airplane crashes but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.
The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites - yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitry) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. In fact, several electronic disruptions occurred in NYC on the day : scores of testimonies reported jammed cellphones and, notoriously, the breakdown of the NYFD firefighters' radio communications was a cause of great concern and outrage. The WTC towers' internal communication system was also inexplicably blacked out.
Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort - not a large 'passenger airliner'. Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that none of the official descriptions of the events are credible. The inescapable fact is that the television images of 9/11 did not depict the real events of that fateful day. The mainstream media's involvement on 9/11 is the unspeakable truth of our times.
ABOUT EMP/HERF(or HPM) electromagnetic weaponry :
http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/the-dawn-of-the-ebomb
There can be no denying that the development of EMP/HERF technology has been a strategic military priority over the last decades. One of the main features of EMP/HERF weapons is their ability to disrupt - selectively - the enemy's electronic systems. In this video, I contend / postulate that this technology was likely used to disrupt temporarily videocamera circuitries in the Manhattan area. It has been counter-argued that this would have caused all sorts of disruptions in other electronic appliances. Not necessarily so : the disruptive frequencies can be selectively calibrated to affect a specific range of devices. An EMP/HERF diffuser might have been placed, say, on top of WTC7 and tested well beforehand. Nevertheless - and interestingly - we know that lenghty cellphone blackouts occured on the day and that firefighters' radio-transmitters also malfunctioned : one could reasonably speculate this was due to some 'bleeding' of the EMP/HERF jamming-beams , thus affecting similar HZ-range electronics.
Theoretically, a total videocamera jamming/blackout was only needed for a few, crucial seconds of the day (tower strikes+tower collapses). Nevertheless, it seems likely it was applied throughout the 102 minutes of the morning events (+ in the afternoon at the time of the WTC7 collapse ) to prevent any private footage to record the events as they unfolded IN REALITY.
In any event, it should be clear that the various videos betray irreconcilable discrepancies. It is up to everyone's logic to make sense out of the imagery we were fed on 9/11by the major TV networks. With the available evidence now at hand, the most reasonable conclusion is that most - if not all - of the 9/11 TV 'newscasts' were but a series of pre-fabricated, digital fabrications.
MUCH MORE info here: http://www.cluesforum.info/
video from: https://www.youtube.com/user/OzzybanOswald
Loading...
13:00
9_11 PSYOP - 10 Years Laterby dwayne113811 views
What about eyewitness reports ?
UvbeenFooledagain 2 months ago