Froch vs Dirrell : Why Dirrell blew it

Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell last night drew lots of controversy from fight fans. Dirrells had the skill, but not the will, to TAKE that belt. Froch came to fight, Dirrell did not.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Carl
• Froch
• Andre
• Dirrell
• kessler
• taylor
• ko
• abraham
• ward
• super
• six

[dropanuke]

Watching this again froch clearly won the fight, I think a split decision was rubbish

[pacholito24]

dirrell lost this,his clinching and running ruined that fight,you could see it that he wantes out of that fight,same as abrahams.

[skywalk3x]

I guess you like Froch but you tell half the tale. holding is done so much in boxing that refs don`t know when to call foul. For instance when your hurt or under pressuer you can hold, but you can`t other wise? So why would you hold other than when your under pressure or hurt. Buster Douglas, Evander Holyfield, and Lennox lewis all held Tyson and won and no hold penalties were called. It`s a shame

[cazz3000]

@KILLUMINATI233 i already do, in fact, i can appreciate both sports due to the fact that i am not a close minded, ignorant american :)

[KILLUMINATI233]

@cazz3000 lol go watch ufc fool

[fr4nk7777777]

Only rabbit punches when you're being held. Don't hug and it won't happen.

[WillieBization]

A lot of european fighters, Froch included, throw rabbit punches consistantly to the back of head like its legal.

[luckybthaboss]

Dirrell won by a mile

[rjmurder]

yo i saw this fight and i know for a fact that Froch lost....the ref probably wasnt gonna take the point away if Dirrell didnt head but Froch at the end of the Clinch.. bet none of yall saw that. Dirrell won but that touch of heads at the end of the clinch served as his downfall for this fight

[cazz3000]

@itchygonads tee hee, u mad brah?

who won? ;)