Sufficient Evidence To Believe In God?
Top Comments
All Comments (1,584)
-
@kr4yzi32k They're pretty much one and the same group in the US.
-
Good Video.. Thanks for shared..
-
@ChipArgyle Republicans do the same thing sadly.
-
4:28 - What's the saying? "Proof is for math and whiskey"?
-
@PBGellie Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim, to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.
-
@1tabligh your claim is nothing more than a *fanatical* illusion based on unproven theories too though, mine however, comes from multiple sources. My theory is testable. My theory has tangable evidence (fossil records, carbon dating etc). Yours comes from a single book that you dont even know for sure is truth. And the fact that god is "non-material" in your eyes means he doesnt exist. He isnt there. Im not the deluded one here. Im the one using logic.
-
@edewkateddatme no. light is waves of energy that have a wavelength of a certain frequency that seperates it from other forms of wave like energy (x rays, radio waves, infared waves). I dont want him to subtly provide clues to me, i want him to show up in front of me and say "whats up."
-
@edewkateddatme look. im not doubting that jesus was a real person. there is evidence of that. but, there is no evidence that he is the son of god. God is all that matters here, jesus doesnt.
It's kind of cruel to ask theists to go read and learn about a subject before arguing against it, because they're not known for reading and learning things for themselves. They sit in pews with their jaws agape, mindlessly absorbing whatever prattle their spiritual leader spews while filling the offering plate with their hard earned money.
ChipArgyle 3 months ago 9
Too stupid for science? Try religion.
kriss299 1 month ago 7