UA175 - the last 12 seconds - part2
Uploader Comments (achimspok)
Top Comments
-
Some facts: According to the flight manifests, no Arab boarded those flights. There are no cc records of Arabs purchasing tickets. Disabling transponders do not cause radar invisiblity. Security videos of the alleged hijackers have no reliable chain of custody. The two cell calls alleging "boxcutters" from Barbara Olson failed, (FBI). Atta was a partier with no interest in religion. Many of the alleged hijackers had close ties to US military, intelligence and security institutions... etc etc
-
so if the freedom of information request shows the planes last used in Dec?, as I understand , would it be possible to preset some kind of control of the plane, even though they knew the 'alleged' hijackers would be taking over the plane, at some point in flight, remote takeover of the plane would continue the course into the buildings regardless of who was the pilot.....this would still keep the hijackers as suspect #1 even if they really weren't in control. Any search for truth is justice...
All Comments (55)
-
wow, what a quality piece of work here. have you seen the 175 attached pod view from the front. its title is roof top view twin towers. also the slow motion, zoomed in views of the first tower collapse and building seven collapse show detonation flashes . and pentagon before collapse show tiny entry hole, round exit hole, not a scratch on the lawn hitting at the base of the building
-
What was up with the example at the beginning that in no way related to driving a plane into the twin towers?
-
Your right! It was a hologram!
-
@YousufM24 lol u mean shittember clues. its such bullshit its unreal. type in cgi planes debunked 2 watch the fox fake plane thing get debunked
-
The english in this video is not in my humble opinion very good. Please can you team up with someone that is better at English, then be more explanitary and verbose.
In the first secong about driving a car accross ice I understood you talked about making one handle movement. I presume that this is what actually happened. So what? Why would a human not do that.
-
This looks to be concise detailed data that excludes the possibility of a human pilot due to inhumanly precise visual data verified from existing sources.
Looks to be pretty iron clad.
-
I checked the BTS and there is almost completely consistent BTS record of the tailnumbers in question during the months before 9/11 2001
-
Never go full Retard!
-
@bloggulator could you send me where i could look at that info?
i spent about an hour looking throughout NTSB website
thanks
-
I'm not sure where this video goes. Is it about NIST committing another error in its 9/11 investigations? Fine, but there are already so many anyways, some of which being outright fraudulent...
Is this an invitation to question whether the Boeings were "prepped" for 9/11 and maybe were switched with other planes, perhaps above some airport?
Love,
At 4:33, 4:38, 4:42, 4:47, 4:52 and 4:57 why did the right wing of the real plane "disappear" just before the crash? And why is the plane black coloured at bright sunshine? Please watch here at YT "September Clues".
YousufM24 2 years ago
Q1: low resolution + interlaced source + converted (e.g. framerate) + compressed to fit into pre-HQ-youtube.
Google for MPEG compression!
Q2: the plane flew into the shadow of the smoke from the North Tower + high contrast (nice day) poorly handled by a consumer handycam.
achimspok 2 years ago
Did you watch "September Clues"? Pls let me know!
Take care
YousufM24 2 years ago
Oh yes. What a waste of time.
Watch my "No Plane Manifesto". It's some kind of "September Clues Parody".
achimspok 2 years ago
that sounds dumb, sorry. A plane flew into the shadow of the smoke? How stupid do you think I must be, to belive this? No way...
YousufM24 2 years ago
Don't believe anything. Just analyze the position of the smoke + the position of the sun + the position of the plane.
But you also may believe in TV anchors starring on an empty screen and clapping hands to say "Oh my god!" in the right moment or in backdrops hiding New Jersy and in moving bridges because the CGI guys were drunken when they planned 9/11.
...it's so funny! Someone must have planted these things to descredit any real effort. You can't be that stupid.
achimspok 2 years ago
...can't you?
achimspok 2 years ago