9/11 CONSPIRACY: STEEL BUILDINGS DON'T COLLAPSE FROM FIRE

A new branch of 9/11 research claims to have identified the cause of the collapse of the twin towers. The photographic and video evidence makes a very strong case for thermite being responsible for the unprecedented implosions of steel framed reinforced buildings on September 11.

Brigham Young University physicist Professor Steven Jones told peers at a Utah meeting that, "while almost no fire, even one ignited by jet fuel, can cause structural steel to fail, the combination of thermite and sulfur "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• news
• politics
• bush
• 9/11
• inside
• job
• controlled
• demolition
• osama
• jet
• fuel
• steel
• physics
• BYU
• thermite
• steven
• jones
• USA

[smashu2]

@TheTylershea Whitout anything leaking ?? you are a moron it's leaking all over the place lol you are a tard monkey.

[cher716]

@TimothyRaymond1

Apparently a few days before 9/11 there was noise on an empty floor and cameras were temorarily down due to maintenance. Also I do see little explosions happening even in news videos, so somethings fishy, not sure what to believe because I wasn't there. but I can't ignore that the CIA building nicely collapsed too the same way and didn't get hit by a plane.

[metallicadyerseve]

For all 9/11 conspiracy people out there, fuck off. You're not enlightened, you haven't seen the 'truth', you know fuck all. Now show some respects for the people who died that day.

[TheTylershea]

@bridaks your telling me that the same country who is 14 trillion in debt and can barely handle itself could pull this off? without anything leaking?

[TheTylershea]

@NOmeansnoFAN let me ask you no im no steel technician nor can i spell hahaha but wouldnt a fire with jet engine fuel weaken the steel. and a plane flying in at that speed that is that heavy plus the burning fuel and heat would i believe weaken the structure dont you think then as the loads from the top push down on it it could cause it to collaspe, but hey everyone has their thoughts

Semper fi

[AmericanGhoul]

@TimothyRaymond1 "It was not just fire that destroyed the buildings. This video does not mention the fact that very large plains impacted them. It was a combination of fire and severe damage to the structure that caused the buildings to collapse." - TimothyRaymond1

...Don't forget the Tooth Fairy & the Easter Bunny riding Santa Claus's light-speed sleigh.

[Tirius9393]

a plane can't bring down a building, even combined with burning jet fuel; if that were the case then the building would have collapsed sideways; instead, it collapsed the SAME EXACT WAY it would have collapsed if detonated by explosives, in this case explosives strong enough to burn through steel; the way that firefighter explained it in the fire station is exactly the way a building comes down via detonation, which was the same way the WTC came down

[bridaks]

They blinded us for a while but we are awakened to the truth of this inside job now.

It was a very complex operation that required hundreds of people to accomplish

We have all the required evidence to prosecute but naturally we are lacking the Judicial Power to take those responsible to Court and than to Jail.

The people need to take their Country back into their hands and Demand accountability for what was done and still being done worldwide.

Wake up to their lies friends.

Love&Light

[KatieCosmicessence]

@iEatYourSandviches jet fuel does not burn at even half those temperatures

[TimothyRaymond1]

It was not just fire that destroyed the buildings. This video does not mention the fact that very large plains impacted them. It was a combination of fire and severe damage to the structure that caused the buildings to collapse.