Drooling Over Patty's Right Leg: Yet another Look at the Patterson/Gimlin Film

Even now, forty-three years after Roger Patterson shot his historic film footage, no subsequent evidence can hold a candle to it. Just focusing on the features of the figure's right leg alone provides convincing detail.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Bigfoot
• Sasquatch
• Patterson/Gimlin
• Film
• Anatomical
• Detail

[Jeromenon]

@eminboztepe Your a fucking freak of nature ! Biased bigoted TOOL

[suitsyouDesign64]

@ffmcmav40 A lie detector test Detects anxiety not lying ...Somebody like Bob H who has spent years lying and making up story's would easily pass, Like many serial killers have . First it was Phillip Morris who made the suit , Then a few years later his story shifted to Chambers,Then he was caught phoning Patterson's wife up to ask her to play along and agree it was a hoax to get money Lies Lies Lies money MONEY and LIES It's the story of bob heironimus

[shadow0imposter]

why do people argue over this footage? one side says you can clearly tell its a costume the other says its impossible you can clearly see the muscle move, details in the face ect ect. if you believe its real awesome if you dont awesome.

[ffmcmav40]

Planet of the apes is the worst comparison I ever heard. Your talking about a movie where the apes are SUPPOSED to be VERY HUMANLIKE, walk like humans, talk like humans, look like humans. They are not supposed to look, act, move, like Bigfoot (as if anyone knows). I mean how many costumes did they have to make for that movie? It was all about quantity not quality. But Patty has never been qualified by any expert in the field as a good costume anyways.

[bigskip2121]

if this is a Costume, it would have to be hair on latex applied pieces. There would have to also be robotic extentions on the arms and air bladders to articulate the muscle movements and the facial expressions. We could easily do this today, but a couple of cowboys in 1967? not probable. planet of the apes was made in 1966-1968 and even those costumes look fake the way they move and turn and that was the hight of cosume art back then.

[sonbuhitsunei]

@kfbpro22 lol Well, there is the logging industry that would be impacted by it, so maybe the logging companies are silencing people! XD I mean, I don't think they'd be happy if the thing turned out to actually exist, because it'd mean more forest areas would be off-limits to them.

[ffmcmav40]

The polygraph machine itself is not flawed which is why it's still used on a daily basis thousands of times a day 365/year. The person giving it may not administer correctly and therein lies the problem. Since no human is infallible the test can be given incorrectly hence the the inadmissible part. This does not mean however that anyone can pass a polygraph. Those are the facts.

[ffmcmav40]

Saying that polygraphs have flaws cracks me up. So you can name a few instances where they say it didn't work. Ok yahoo that's great for you right? Wrong. So your basically telling me that out of the THOUSANDS of polygraphs that are given daily over decades which works out to be how many? You can name a few? So your basically saying for Bob H to be able to take and pass not 1 but 2 makes the odds of it being wrong astronomical!

[kfbpro22]

Government cover ups of Bigfoot killings? Not impossible...

[wargasm58]

If it eixsted they would have found at least dead ones by now, end of story