The Necessarily Existent One

Please rate each part and leave your comments to the last one.

The 2nd Part:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aREYu8xrfFs

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Proving
• God
• Exists
• Theism
• Creator
• Rational
• Reason
• Logic
• Wisdom
• Philosophy
• Supernature
• Skeptic
• Metaphysics
• Divine
• Atheism
• Islam
• Christianity
• Richard
• Dawkins
• Jesus
• Christ
• Muhammad
• asw
• Allah
• YHWH
• Jehovah
• Creation
• Evolution
• Debate
• Fact
• Proof
• Evidence
• Sign
• Teleology
• Theology
• Inspiration
• Revelation
• Challenge
• Free
• Thinking

[Elvisdogg]

interesting.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

wow

:D

its been a long time dude

so,did you remember me?

[runevirage]

If you had a clear understanding of evolution, astronomy,chemistry, physics etc. you would probably understand that natural systems such as evolution, and chemical processes such as photosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, abiogenesis and even the birth of the universe require no conscious force to guide or start it. That is the main point in your video. Your pharmacist example also uses circular reasoning; does the ocean exist because of the fish in it, or do fish exist because of the ocean?

[IpsaPaphum]

Bluff? My dictionaries (e.g. Collins/English, VanDale/Dutch) register Muhammadan, Mohammedaan as an older word for muslim. As to the Q, that's what I would call a bluff. Inflated rhetoric, derivative ideas, muddled narrative. Banal and bellicose. To end on a positive point: it sounds beautiful when recited in Arabic. :)

[alianchild]

Arrrg. The stupid. IT BURNS!!!!!

[entreupioneer]

This guy makes no sense. Let me pick out a few phrases: Ad Hominem, Higgs Boson, natural Avatism, simple decadence of Divinity. So everything is relative, huh Albert Einstein? Take my advice, a little less word play and more getting to the point.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

there is nothing called "Muhammedan" in Islam

this is a bluff to say such thing

but if you wonder Islamic theism,you can read Quran

and by the way,this video doesnt already want any religious view in

whatever said in this video is already all about simple thinking

peace

[IpsaPaphum]

In any theism that I know of, Christian, Muhammadan. I could borrow Pascal's words to make the same point: "Not the God of the philosophers, but the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob!" A necessarily existent being or substance could be arrived at through a process of logical reasoning; a creator God, author of holy book or books is a matter of faith and, I venture to suppose, the product of self-delusion.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

in which theism..?

[IpsaPaphum]

In theism not only God is real. His creation is real too. That makes for duality or plurality. A creator's existence is debatable. It's a bluff to call it/him 'the necessarily existent one'.

[religiousvom1t]

Do not fight with the Ad Hominem, surely one intelligent as you can avoid them. Your God is the Higgs Boson. Your continuos change is evolution and the printing block is natural atavism and I mean this everything is relative. You don't defend your opposing stances you merely pick out the aspects your capable of criticizing(thats impossible!) you over complicate them and then present your stance as the simple decadence of Divinity.If you love this God, this would be blasphemy. Define Nature?