Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Hide The Decline

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,018
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (evilbughead)

  • @EDMBOB Really and where are the links proving the facts that you are stating? Because where I live it has been getting cooler since 2000

Top Comments

  • Rightfuckingon!

    Stop the socialists!

    Vote em out in November!

    NOBAMA! the basturd....

  • Not only is falsified data a scientific crime, it's funded by our tax dollars.

    Throw the book at Michael Mann!

    Save our planet from AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) fraud.

    Human beings produce less than 10 percent of the carbon dioxide in our atmosphere which is just .038 percent. The real driving force behind climate change is the wobble of the earth's axis (Google Precession of the Equinoxes) and nobody, not even Al Gore or Barak Obama can stop it!

see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @EDMBOB And 100 years-span in a 4.6 Ga period is scientifically relevant how?

  • Michael Mann was exonerated by experts, all of who benefited from grant money, secured by Michael Mann.

    Why won’t the climate change scientific community, enter into debate with the deniers? Why do the hysterian’s refuse to open up the raw data to the public?

    I remember the hysterian’s of the 1970’s making claim to the pending doom of the coming of a new ice age.

    Man caused climate change is about the money and power they want us to hand over to them.

  • @coldwarvet75 Why do you call it climate change hysteria? Are you qualified to make such an assessment? Do you actually read the science, or have you just made up your mind without enough knowledge to make a scientifically skeptical assessment. I respect skepticism based on a scientific assessment, but I have no respect for someone to dismiss a scientific idea based on preconceived notions or confirmation bias. So I ask you again, upon what scientific basis do you claim this is hysteria?

  • @nevermindedness - I do not see how climate change hysteria is going to effect big oil. Like I said; “the demand for their energy products is mushrooming”” as developing nations are adding hundreds of thousands of new combustion engines into the global market place every year. They actually have a product that the global market place is willing to purchase. The climate hystertians have nothing but fear to use, as they extort more and more money from those who actually provide goods or services.

  • @coldwarvet75 Some of what you say may be true. However, what I see happening in the next decade or so is that energy technology comprised of biodiesel (possibly dominated by algal), natural gas, wind, solar, and possibly nuclear will replace much of traditional coal, oil, and gas energy for a variety of reasons: peak oil, national security (for industrialized nations), climate change, etc. The US and the Eurozone will be striving for energy independence through these developing technologies.

  • @nevermindedness Tell me its not so. Are you amongst those whose brain has been washed by the hysterians who wield the grading pen?

    The fact is that traditional energy sources will not be replaced with wind & sun. The expansion of energy used throughout the globe is at a mushroom pace. Cap & Tax is not going to be imposed on the developing world where US factories and jobs will be headed with its enactment.

  • @coldwarvet75 There is literally tens of trillions of dollars at stake by the energy companies in this debate. I would say their motivation to provide Pavlovian rewards to those who would argue against anthropogenic global warming are far greater than anyone else. Climate scientists are highly educated intelligent people that could easily make more money working for someone like ExxonMobile that toiling away over climate data. If money were their motivation, they could make much more elsewhere.

  • @nevermindedness Pavlov's dog. Those who support man caused climate change are supported with more grant money. Those who do not support man caused climate change are on the outside looking in at the money trough.

  • @klnine glad to hear someone else with common sense out there thank you and god bless. The good war has just begun please get involved and talk to friends and family we got to stop the corruption in this country on both sides of the isle the only way we can stop it is get involved and vote

  • @OregonOutlaw2000 you are my man ! A bullet is cheaper though. Actually second thoughts..I'll buy the rope, ..and I'll do uncle Al for free !

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more