Perkins: Being green promotes abortion & homosexuality.
Uploader Comments (BI30)
Top Comments
-
FRC should be registered as an official hate group if they aren't already. What a bunch of bigots.
-
it's funny how gay marriage lost in CA and then there was a firestorm right after.
All Comments (50)
-
@BI30 Totally agree.
-
Many of these preachers are worth 100 times what Job was worth. That's greed, luxury, excess, materialism and worldliness. Their pattern of behavior mirrors that of the Pharisees(who had Christ killed). They cast aside the core Christian values of : Love, mercy, forgiveness, humility and meekness. Their focus is on : violence, greed, lies, and hatred of everyone different than them. they're the champions of big business that cuts billions of lives short with their chemicals, wars et cetera
-
people are so fucking dumb, lmao
-
Tony Perkins fails to understand the phrase "Enlightened self-interest."
-
Why is everything about abortion and homosexuality to these so-called Christians?
-
If gay marriage is "population control", GOOD. We've already got ENOUGH poeple in this crowded fucking world. 6.9 billion people is a lot. Doesn't Perkins not understand that? And unlike abortion, gay relations are population control that DOESN'T kill a single life or cell! It's fucking win-win.
-
"Pro-Marriage" in Christianese means "I hate Gay people"
-
Not saying they don't exist, but I don't even know any Gay environmentalists and I have alot of gay friends. The ones I know are all into Gay rights activism.
-
I lol'ed.
That FRC guy is stupid as fuck.
-
"God will bring to ruin those ruining the earth."~Revelation 11:18 How can Perkins say those things then?
It's not a question of whether or not global warming is happening or not. It's whether it is caused by human civilizations or if it is nature's cycle of warming and cooling. That is the debate and while it's fine with me if those who would like to spend trillions on trying to prevent global warming from occuring
want to spend their own money toward the effort - just don't legislate another tax on the already overtaxed millions of people who do not agree.
onlinefreedomclub 3 years ago
Other than being off-topic, your comment is also lacking in perspective.
While you can ague whether the threat is man made or not, the urgency at which it must be dealt with is not in question.
It is like arguing over whether you are dying of a bullet wound or the resulting infection. Either way, if something is not done quickly, the patent will die. And whether or not your tax dollars should be spent on something that benefits you, is not up for debate.
BI30 3 years ago
the planets going to do what its going to do whether or not we intervine
pantera1012000 2 years ago
Then I suggest the next time you get sick, don't take anything for it.
Them germs are going to do what them germs are going to do whether or not you "intervine".
BI30 2 years ago 7
@BI30 Isn't what we spend taxes on, ALWAYS up for debate? Isn't that the idea of representative government? I don't want to pay even more for gas and electricity because some people think we can engineer global climate change to our preference.
EternallyRecurring 1 year ago
@EternallyRecurring I don't believe I ever suggested otherwise. If we reduce our dependency on fossil fuels, thus reducing the demand for them, their price will go down, not up.
BI30 1 year ago 5