Monckton Bunkum Part 3 - Correlations and Himalayan glaciers

CORRECTION: At 14:46 I say "earthquakes" when I mean "glaciers".

SOURCES:

10" "Apocalypse? No!" -- film by Christopher Monckton, 2007

1'03" Speech sponsored by Minnesota Free Market Institute St. Paul, October 2009

1'38" "CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate" -- D. Royer et al, GSA Today, March 2004

1'54" "Geocarb III: A revised model of atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time" -- R. Berner and Z. Kothavala, American Journal of Science, Feb 2001

2'01" Ibid.

2'18" "CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate" -- D. Royer et al, GSA Today, March 2004

2'27" Ibid.

2'40" "CO2-forced climate thresholds during the Phanerozoic" -- D. Royer, Geochimica 2006

4'45" Solar output graph from James Imamura, University of Oregon Dept of physics
http://jersey.uoregon.edu/~imamura/12...

5'11" "Atmospheric CO2: Principal Control Knob Governing Earth's Temperature" -- A. Lacis et al, Science, 2010

5'22" Monckton-Lambert debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nB5N8E...

9'11" "CO2 levels required for deglaciation of a 'near-snowball' Earth"
T. Crowley et al, Geophysical Research Letters, 2001

9'45" "CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate" -- D. Royer et al, GSA Today, March 2004

11'24" "Is the Siachen glacier melting?" -- R. Ganjoo and M. Koul, Current Science, August 2009

• Category

  Science & Technology

[Julian Makin]

You state the sun was cooler and is now warmer and getting hotter in this video, but you don't put this as a facter in the earth heating, why?

[potholer54]

=You state the sun was cooler and is now warmer and getting hotter in this video, but you don't put this as a facter in the earth heating, why?= Because solar irradiance has been flat since the 1950s. Climatologists conclude that the sun therefore cannot be responsible for most of the warming over the last 35 years. You are confusing this with the increase in irradiance over the phanerozoic, which encompasses 500 million years.

[Z4RUM4N]

@potholer54 You wouldn't happen to be willing to give up the full emails of your correspondence with Monckton would you? (or have simply missed them?) I'm kinda interested in reading his full emails.

[potholer54]

=You wouldn't happen to be willing to give up the full emails of your correspondence with Monckton would you?= I've put them on the videos. Just use the pause button to read them. If you have trouble reading anything, let me know and I'll send you a copy. But no good asking me questions in the body of a video forum. I have dozens of videos on my channel and I can't monitor every message on every forum. You're lucky I caught this one.

[SynerG4ce]

As of the 14th of April, 2011, 7 people are willfully ignorant fucks.

[Yan Enn]

Pothelar54 is a good teacher

[creationmyass]

you've got to be insane. he was showing how monkton is the sneering and ad hominem guy, not potholer54.

[baserocklove]

God, the more i watch this the more it baffles me how people can be duped by this guy.

I mean christ, i hadn't even heard of this clown before i decided to choose AGW as my new pet science project to educate myself about and it took me about 20 minutes to see he lies about being in the house of lords, lied about being margaret thatchers science adviser, lied about curing hiv, lied about curing influenza, lied about his graves. that IMMEDIATELY made me suspect his climate change claims.

[baserocklove]

Potholer. What you do is a lot of work and i can imagine it's quite thankless much of the time. Please don't ever lose sight of how important your work is.

[Roman Ilies]

Potholer54. Your level of integrity, discipline and proper logical and structured thinking is amazing. I love you passion for precision, non-sensationalism and evidence. Keep up the great work. You are a breath of fresh air in a world of misinformation and exaggeration so thank you.

[DoneWithDogma]

Show me just ONE thing that you've said on this page, that has substance and is actually worth responding to, or arguing against, because you haven't. I wasn't trying to argue, I was simply publishing my thesis that you are in fact a fuckwit, and my substantiating evidence is that you think Potholer has "exactly 7" videos on his channel. I have yet to witness any contradiction to my thesis that you are a fuckwit.

[Hemeshethey]

That's an argument? Sheesh. I thought my five year old nephew had much to learn about debate.

[DoneWithDogma]

says the guy who saw "exactly 7" videos on potholer's channel.

[j02t94r]

No, read below the title and you will find he has 102 vids, or do you distrust YouTube too?