A-10 Thunderbolt vs. SU-25 Frogfoot

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
34,195
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 15, 2010

Comparacion entre los dos mejores aviones de ataque a tierra del mundo .

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (273)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Two great aircrafts!

  • @Buuub08 a-10 is more suited if you have full air dominance plus those a-10 eengines are really loud, dont forget that there are also modefied su-25s

  • @ogi415 Well, the A-10 would have something along the lines of AGM-65 or AGM-114.

    The A-10 is about just as old as the Su-25, given continuous upgrades in avionics it would actually be better geared than a Su-25.

    A-10 can carry more than 7 tons or ordinance on it, Su-25 only 4.5. There is no match, the Su-25 is intentionally smaller, lighter and faster than the A-10 being built for a different purpose/war scenario. They are NOT competing designs by any stretch of imagination.

  • @Buuub08 Well then anti-ship and anti-radar missiles are worthy. And i believe the vikhr's can destroy all modern tanks. By the a-10 which one do you mean ? The a-10a which is pretty old and outdated or the a-10c which to me is a match at least in weapons capability.

  • @ogi415 That load out (16 missiles) is nothing unique or even note worthy. It has 4 hardpoints under each wing (+3 on fuselage), each point can technically hold up to 4 smaller munitions (excluding the fuselage points), a rocket pod or a larger bomb. Weight is the limit not the number of points or munitions you can attach, Su-25/39 has an identical number of points and as long as the total weight doesnt exceed the load capability it can match the A-10's load out, including 16 missiles.

  • @Buuub08 It's more than the A-10's payload. Well, if it can carry more than 16 missiles on only 2 pylons x8 missiles and being able to carry all the other stuff too ...

  • @MiniMattBrackel1996 They are not directly comparable having only vaguely overlapping tasks.

    The A-10 is larger and heavier, Su-25 is faster and more agile. In a duel situation, excluding the pilot factor, the Su-25 would win based on its performance alone (speed, climb, turn rate). As for ground-attack the A-10 is better for having a notably larger payload and range. Su-39 keeps the agility of Su-25 and adds in the load capability of the A-10 (still slightly less i think).

  • @AlexanderTch You have no idea what you are talking about. The Su-29 is not a Russian attack plane but a turboprop training.

    The Su-34 is replacing the Su-24's and Su-25's.

  • @MiniMattBrackel1996 Bullshit. There is improved version of Su-25CM in serial production and new russian attack plane Su-29 under testing. Thunderbolt is crap if compare to it.

  • a-10 is the last shit in the world

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more