Origin of Stupidity

That they might say that the philosophy of natural right is supported or emphasized by the egalitarian nature of their theology is irrelevant to the fact that natural philosophy is describing things that consistently and reliably behave the way they do regardless of what is theologically true or not true. Whose conclusions and implications we're compelled to meet simply for pragmatic ends.

My point is it's emerged in several different places, from several different sources, whether from cultural synchronicity or as a quasi-original thought it always pertained to humans just the way they are in the philosophy, their natural state, not theological in anyway. The common man thought it was, commonly confused it as such, still do regularly, but the epicureans sure didn't and neither did it matter even for most of those philosophers that were pagan or other afterword...

amen sister, I couldn't agree with you more. I think I may have to subscribe and watch more of your vids.

The thinking was different then. How can you say "Well, it was different in this way but not this way"? It's still different.
You're almost agreeing with me. I don't see what we're arguing here. We agree human rights were ignored for a while in history and came into being. I'm saying they came into being while people were thinking about God and how he gave life. What about you?
I have no dissonance. There is no contradiction in my thought that I have seen yet or that you have yet pointed out.

its called origin of stupidity because you never figured it out ^_^

Nice video. KKKirk is a douche-bag.

Fantastic, thank you!

noice work

i love you, criss. will you be my friend?