Cass Sunstein On The Right To Bear Arms
Top Comments
All Comments (255)
-
Gun control requires the cooperation of criminals.
Let's not be stupid, professor.
-
saying the 2nd amendment protects the state's right to own fire arms and not the individual's is like saying the 13th protects only slave owners from being slaves and not everyone.
he is obviously a zionist scumbag.
-
@125sea This is exactly what these people intend.
-
Take my gun from me, and you will find you only receive the hot led inside
-
My fellow Americans, the best thing I can say in response to this is, "Keep your powder dry!" A war is coming, and all freedom loving people will be impelled to fight in order to ensure its existence for their posterity.
In the words of Charlton Heston, "FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!"
-
Cass sunshit i call you out for a duel. We will do it how our forefathers had!
-
Yeah ok this guy knows a lot about law considering he believes that animals have the right to be represented in court and all this extremist garbage. But i do know of some prominent people that would agree with him on gun control: Adolf Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and Mao Tse Tung. Haha
-
Cut this guys tongue out and drop him off naked in the middle of Antarctica!
-
what secures the rights of the people against bureaucratic, irrepresentative statute?
Armed people, jerkoff.
-
You want my guns, you fascist little brown-shirt? Face me like a REAL MAN, rather than the effeminate gutless-wonder coward you are - come and get 'em with your own two hands, if you've got the jewels!
Cass Sunstein, I was born in Soviet Union and I know the history:
all most bloody and twisted things happens because of "good intentions" of some "dreamers" like Lenin, Stalin, Mao and so on...
- first, they disarmed population and then their hanchmen killed millions with repressions.
So, let's not repeat the history.
to have guns is one of the basic amendments. Right?
it was written by people who knew the history and human nature.
125sea 1 year ago 11
Cass Sunstein, here are some basics:
any attempt to disarm people would disarm only the Law abiding citisens
and wouldn't affect criminals who don't respect the law.
so such policy would only impover the criminals and endanger the Law abiding citisens and so such ideas and policy are harmful and idiotic in it's core.
125sea 1 year ago 7