@Wildkkat1 ok ur for the az law but against the war. that doesn't make sense...... im guessing u haven't served ur community or country.....community service put forth by a judge does not count....asking the military for body bags is prob the lowest thing u could ever do.....btw in the az law is explicit instructions to question anyone who LOOKS like they might be illegal.....with that said i think its fair to say that is the very definition of prejudice....
I concerned with all illegals, both those who sneak in & those who overstay.
The overstayers can be reduced by better record keeping & enforcement.
The ones who sneak in can only be effectively reduced by building a wall. illegal immigration has been greatly reduced in the areas where the wall has been completed. As I said b4, with a wall illegal immigration would be reduced to a small percentage of what it is now.
You could not be more wrong. In Reno v American-Arab Anti Discrimination Committee Scalia wrote "an alien unlawfully in this country has no constitutional right to assert selective enforcement as a defense against his deportation. When an alien's presence in the country is in violation of the immigration laws, the government does not offend the Constitution by deporting him,"
i didnt know you can tell people to shut up on the radio o:
Fernandoramirez5513 10 months ago
fuck yeah rush... fuck yeah
JThrashYT 1 year ago
@TheBobbiK 4 in the corps, semper-fi. Illegals from china or mexico everyone has to follow the same law, no exceptions.
Wildkkat1 1 year ago
@Wildkkat1 ok ur for the az law but against the war. that doesn't make sense...... im guessing u haven't served ur community or country.....community service put forth by a judge does not count....asking the military for body bags is prob the lowest thing u could ever do.....btw in the az law is explicit instructions to question anyone who LOOKS like they might be illegal.....with that said i think its fair to say that is the very definition of prejudice....
TheBobbiK 1 year ago
you are grate but you knew that
iphoneguy2012 1 year ago
This is the only thing I have ever heard Rush say that I can agree with. And yes, he is being facetious.
Melthornal 1 year ago
@waydownNMway
I concerned with all illegals, both those who sneak in & those who overstay.
The overstayers can be reduced by better record keeping & enforcement.
The ones who sneak in can only be effectively reduced by building a wall. illegal immigration has been greatly reduced in the areas where the wall has been completed. As I said b4, with a wall illegal immigration would be reduced to a small percentage of what it is now.
Common sense should lead you to agree.
78topper 1 year ago
@waydownNMway
oh and he was joined in the opinion by Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.
You lose.
How embarrassing this must be for you : (
78topper 1 year ago
@waydownNMway
You could not be more wrong. In Reno v American-Arab Anti Discrimination Committee Scalia wrote "an alien unlawfully in this country has no constitutional right to assert selective enforcement as a defense against his deportation. When an alien's presence in the country is in violation of the immigration laws, the government does not offend the Constitution by deporting him,"
78topper 1 year ago
@78topper ... Besides, if even Justice Scalia says you're wrong, what does that say about you? You think the idea is ridiculous, but it's just fact.
waydownNMway 1 year ago