Free Speech or Free For All?

The difference.

And: why Naomi is Wrong.


Rwandan Genocide. The role of broadcasts:
http://www.article19.org/pdfs/publications/rwanda-broadcasting-genocide.pdf

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Why
• Naomi
• Naomi94
• NaomiKnight
• is
• wrong
• DMCA
• abuse

[deicidalistic]

R.I.P. To me these letters changed meaning when I accepted atheism. They don't mean to wish the dead to accept their demise but for the family of the demised to accept. The R.I.P. is not meant to keep the dead asleep lol!

[rozeboosje]

Interesting. Not entirely sure what it has to do with this particular video though :-)

[FrodenOrange]

OMG Did you say something, cause I was distracted by the awesomeness of your slippers ;P.

[rozeboosje]

Ha!

[rozeboosje]

They're my wife's, she's had them like, forever!

[alovelytime]

i agree with you.

but if the opinion to murder and rape you and all atheists were broadcast and you and atheists started getting murdered and raped, i'll do what i can to stop that opinion from being broadcast.

[rozeboosje]

Yes. Terms of Use violations. He uploaded videos showing a private residence and identified who lived there.

[thefakeyeti]

Here is the thing..

If someone wanted me dead, I would rather them be able to be on a soap box expressing it freely!

I would be able to refute them, and I would be WARNED.

As if it were illegal it would be underground, where they only vocalize it to nutty people, who might actually do it!

And I would have no real chance to refute them, and no warning.

[alovelytime]

i agree with you.

i don't wish to make speech illegal.

but, its case by case to me.

if opinions to murder and rape of a person or group are made publically and murder and rape happens, then i'll err on the side of caution and deny that opinion a public airing.

if opinions to civil disobedience or revolt are made public, i'll support the right to air that opinion publically, even if people die as a result of revolt or civil disobedience.

[thefakeyeti]

for example: I would rather have muslims FREELY expressing their opinion, that all infidels must die.

Then have them carefully expressing their opinions to those that already share it.

This gives me a better oppurtunity to persway them that they are incorrect.

As if it goes unchecked, they will simply feed on each other and it will be worse then letting them FREELY state it..

Making speech illegal, does not eliminate it!

[thefakeyeti]

apparently this account (voicesinthehead) as been suspended...

I tried to view the channel..