Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae "insolvent"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,953
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 11, 2008

Too Big to Fail, I keep hearing that phrase so often when referencing the possible collapse of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, despite their stock losing 87% and 79% of their value since last year.
Anyhow, some of the reports from various news outlets nearly gave me a heart-attack, I continued searching and reading for related articles, such as the excerpt from a Wall Street Journal article (1.) which states " The liabilities of Fan and Fred are currently not on this U.S. balance sheet. But one danger is a run on the debt of either company, putting pressure on the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to publicly guarantee that debt to prevent a systemic Financial Collapse". The commentator of the financial times states that the firms are "too big to fail", but if they did, according to a Wall street Journal article (1.) the amount that may be burdened upon the civilian tax base is "5 trillion", not Billion but Trillion with a Capital "T".
Strangely, William Poole a former St. Louis Federal Reserve President has publicly lashed out on the speculation of a bail out, he states in a Bloomberg article(2 ) " Congress ought to recognize that these firms are insolvent, that it is allowing these firms to continue to exist as bastions of privilege , financed by the taxpayer"( in reference to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae).
Will there be a bail out? Or are both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac too big to fail?
Well Both Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson seem to believe something great is within the mist, so much to the extent, that they are asking for congress for new regulatory powers, obviously they know something is coming up that will require drastic action. So what may be that action, after reading an article from the Mercury News (3) one can easily speculate. The articles quotes Treasury Secretary Paulson as saying " It is clear that some institutions , if they fail , can have systemic impact, However financial players need to be disciplined in managing risk and not expect the government to fly to the rescue" . Paulson also stated " For market discipline to effectively constrain risk, financial institutions must be allowed to fail"

It would seen that Paulson and Bernanke may simply allow these huge firms go under, but in another statement within the same article (3.) they stated " new tools are needed for ensuring an orderly liquidation of a systemically important securities firm that is on the verge of bankruptcy".

Rather confusing, whether they bail them out, or allow them to go under, Paulson and Bernanke have already polished the floors, in the event that either scenario should fall on the floor, both Paulson and Bernanke would claim plausible deniability. Essentially they are cleaning up after themselves beforehand.

Whatever may happen, the size of these firms will have a dramatic impact on the broader economy, regardless in which way it may sway and fall.

Enjoy !!!!!!!

1. "Price of Fannie Mae" July 10, 2008 (Pg.A14) The Wall Street Journal (Online) WSJ.com http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121565255349741343.html?mod=rss_opinion_main

2. Kopecki , Dawn "Fannie, Freddie Insolvent after losses , Poole says Update 1" July 10, 2008 Bloomberg.com
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a7NPAG.LEjHQ

3.Aversa, Jeannine " Bernanke : Empower Financial Regulators " July 10, 2008 Mercury News.com (Associated Press -- Source)




http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_9838817


Just as I was finishing my commentary on the video with related articles, I came upon another article from the New York Times (4) titled "U.S. weighs takeover of Two mortgage giants". Anyhow, the article mentions how Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae may "default on their loans "(No surprise there) and that the government may purchase the two firms under a "conservatorship". Anyhow I have too much of a migraine to explain it, you are going to have to do a bit a reading for yourself --- Enjoy!!!!

4.Labaton, Stephen and Weisman, Steven "U.S. weighs takeover of Two mortgage giants" July 11, 2008 New York Times NYTIMES.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/business/11fannie.html?sq=U.S.%20Weighs%20T...


Video: John Authers "Short View" July 10, 2008 FT.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (StandardJohnDoe)

  • Why can't it be allowed to collapse? Don't give us that $5 trillion+ tax bill!

  • Needs to build momentum and suspense. The spare time will allow just the right people to position themselves for the ensuing mess.

  • The stock market as a whole is up ? That's news to me !

  • So was Zimbabwe stock market when they were printing out 1 million currency notes that would not buy a loaf of bread. As with anything, you need to do your research (Or if your financially able to -- have someone do it for you)

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this shit is planned and controlled

  • at least Mr Kellermann is burning down in hell

  • The housing boom took place from 2002 to 2005. Guess who was in power during that time?

  • When Enron went down that was not public money for the poor. The Democrats ransacked Fannie and Freddie and took your money and put it in their pocket. In the form of PAC money, Obama the 2nd biggest recipient, and his staffers Johnson and Raines who cooked the books to get millions in bonuses. This is why they hate America and want Marxist stye redistribution. The Bolshivicks did the exact same thing.

  • funny how all of this is "distracting" us from the "energy crisis"...wheres the energy bailout?

  • I am against government intervention in the economy at all costs. But does any other average person see the problem with the government NOT assisting the millions of people who are losing their homes BECAUSE of the bad loans but instead GIVING TAXPAYER MONEY AWAY to the greedy crooks who are just as much to blame?

  • I completely agree with you!

  • new! Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac will be nationalised in the following days!

  • America descends into Depression while Congress vacations. 15B in shareholder wealth in these GSE lies without protection while we spend 250B a year building Iraq?

    Maybe Congress should live in Iraq they love so much instead of bailing out the company, shareholders. the WORLD! Foreign investment depends on full faith & credit, we abandoned gold and silver long ago--no one will EVER trust a US GSE again. EVER. Otherwise, this is Depression making loss of full faith & credit, our only asset.

  • Funny how WE tax payers have to pay for these banks (especly Frdrl Banks) they R HUGE HUGE Mney Makers. Yes We tax payers pay. As it is inpossible to file BKRPT on Fed Loans.

    While these CROOKS R getting Arbitration Jmts against each individual consumer who defaulted @ the highest default rate. then they garnish the consumer 25% of their paycheck or put an arbtrtn lien on the consumers property.

    Yes the Feds get their money TWICE

    DEBT IS WORTH MORE THAN THE ORIGINAL LOAN!

    DEBT IS AN ASSET

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more