Evolution of the Eye Part 2

Richard Dawkins explains the evolution of the Eye

Part 2

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolution
• creationism
• creation
• atheist
• Richard
• Dawkins
• eye

[mejc2]

Dawkins is an Idiot. He makes up shit as he goes.

[Sqirril]

And of course you know way more then him right, you just have a biology major right.

[mejc2]

This video is pure fantasy. where do you buy a shirt like that anyway.

[Sqirril]

the 80's

[Malda123]

ye, hes so retarded, that he knows things that u dont,, hmm such an idiot, or its you?

[Sqirril]

In order for me to be retarded he would have to be retarded, and since hes the one with the evidence, logic, and reasoning (among a degree in biology) with the scientific staff supporting him all would need to be retarded and for some reason your not retarded for calling all of them retarded.

[Xellith]

science is fantasy but religion is fact? yea that makes a lotta sense. ROFL.

[ThePearlhead]

@sethblatt Google is your friend

[Xellith]

@Onigirisan technically we have more evidence for dawkins being god than there being a magical god since we know Dawkins exists and he does seem to have amazing logic unlike some gods that supposedly got some almost autistic bronze age men to write a history book.

[Xellith]

@sethblatt you do realise that you can read all the answers to these in textbooks right?

[Xellith]

well we do have eyes on our hands - in fact its all over you. Its called skin. The hands have the greatest amount of nerve endings to get more sense to your hands than any other part of your body (other than the head of the penis and the clitoris).

[sethblatt]

@Xellith (4) If the eyes had evolved in this way, where did our eye-lids come from, and the tear factor to protect our eyes from dirt and dust? Explain these factors.

[sethblatt]

@Xellith So I just have some questions about what was said. (1) If the eye had evolved in this way, how would the optic nerves find it's way to the right part of the brain and how would the brain know what to do with them?(2) If the eyes had evolved in this way, then why wouldn't we have eyes all over our body and even on our hands?(3) If the eyes had evolved in this way, why would we have two of the exact same eyes, wouldn't they be different?...

[Ichthyologistic]

@mejc2 hahahahahahaha! you wish!

[vertigo0331]

I was raised in the church and went to Christian schools my whole childhood. After 12 years as an atheist I never felt i needed to understand evolution to reject the existenceof god. I mean, I was right, but this stuff would have been devastating to my teachers when I was 16!

[cctman]

Oh yeah those pin hole eyes are going to be far better than larger holes for survival of the fittest. Lets see... Dawkins debunked in less than 10 secs...

"Oh look a predator... run! Oh crap I got one spec of dust in my little pin hole eye. I can't see! Damn! I just got eaten! Guess I shouldn't have evolved that small pin hole after all..."

[mejc2]

@acuriousaffair

I am smarter than the average human. That is what is wrong with me.