Re: $5,000.00 ATHEIST CHALLENGE

A reply to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tXbj2hEmh0

Category:

Education

Tags:

• God
• christ
• krishna
• fact
• christian
• religion
• science
• facts
• theism
• scientific
• ask
• jesus
• theology
• spiritual
• challenge
• pretty
• beautiful
• cool
• great
• heroes
• prabhupada
• cop
• ticket
• traffic
• trooper
• happy
• love
• funny
• truth
• hilarious
• awesome
• $5000
• contest
• purushadasa
• 5000
• dollars
• offer
• win
• religious
• dr
• william
• lane
• craig
• atheist
• stupid
• dumb
• lies
• sad
• fail
• dogma
• dawkins
• worshippers
• Darwin
• cult
• bad
• atheism
• violation
• video
• response

[RevolutionBoards]

u photoshopped so much shit to make urself look right u fucking douchebag

[lewiseu]

@RevolutionBoards I didn't photoshop anything, all the images in this video were pulled from google image searches. Also, the images weren't used to make me 'look right', they were put there to make the video marginally more interesting.

[RevolutionBoards]

@lewiseu whatever idfc god aint real so thts that

[lewiseu]

@RevolutionBoards err, yes, that's the point of the video, you do realise that I'm an Atheist, right? I mean, I'm fairly certain I said so in the video.

[luminaeus]

@rockthecityatnight

"Those are the words of the scientists themselves"

1.) I highly doubt a quantum physicist is going to claim that as a proof of god. It's a completely unfounded and non-sequitur statement.

2.) Even if a scientist did make such a statement, it's nothing more than unprovable, untestable opinion. Appeals to authority do not an argument make.

Consider your shit refuted. Have a nice day.

[rockthecityatnight]

@luminaeus "That's so cute" is not a refutation. And I'm not twisting anything those are the words of the scientists themselves. And since you didn't care to attempt to refute it I must assume you clearly see the implication is that God, or at minimum a higher intelligence exists, and must exist.

[luminaeus]

@rockthecityatnight

You didn't make a theorum. You didn't even make a hypothesis. All you did was make a sentence, and even that was a stroke of luck.

"Nothing exists without a conscious observer."

So, if everyone closes their eyes at the same time, the Universe ceases to exist? LOL.

Look at you, trying to into an argument twist a field of science that's not fully understood yet (one which you have zero knowledge or experience with)

That's so cute.

[rockthecityatnight]

@luminaeus Isn't that what the devil told Eve? We are gods? A lie.

That aside, you didn't refute my theorem. Words require a conscious observer and a conscious observer requires words. Words come in many forms, thoughts are words, math requires words. Nothing exists without a conscious observer. So who was the first conscious observer? There has to be one. This is confirmed Quantum mechanics:

watch?v=HNmwuIUQ0qY

[luminaeus]

@rockthecityatnight

What is required for a word to exist?

In written form, a language, paper, and ink must exist before a word can be written. Engraved, the stone must exist first. Typed, the computer and keyboard must first exist.

In spoken form, a word requires air and a person to speak it.

Conclusion?

God is a word and nothing more! Like any other word, it was invented and spoken by man!

[Petrichor91]

@lewiseu

Just don't reply to this Child.

[rockthecityatnight]

Theorem of God

1.) All things that exist must be described in words.

2.) Words describe things, things do not describe words

3.) Therefore all things that exist are first described in words in order to exist

4.) Therefore the first thing to exist must be a word

5.) "In the Beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God" John 1:1

6.) God is the Word and therefore created all things by the first word and therefore God must exist.

[gulbirk]

Wait back, up, why disprove god. The fact that you dont believe in god, is compleatly (100%) validated by the fact that they have not presented any evidence why its real. If everything that isnt proved fals is real, then lepfrecons exict, santa exict, life on mars, bigfoot, ufo`s. Thats not how it works. Its something called burdon of proof. The claimer is the one who must prove his claim right. If his claim cant be proven right, then its aburd to believe it.

[xBLOODBAFx]

i checked up on that guy... and i conclude... asshole pudershadeasshole is asshole.

haha, i think he is troll indeed 0_o he's not even as good as edwardcurrent and that guy's an atheist. he called me a faith cripple LOL , like yah i cant levitate like fken dalsim so i must be spiritually challenged....