Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Kent Hovind Vs. Graduate Student (3 of 3)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,873
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 4, 2007

Kent Hovind attempts to debate a Graduate Student and shows just how much he knows about evolution and common ancestry. This video was originally removed due to fraudulent DMCA claims but has since been reinstated. The original creator's channel is here. :)

http://youtube.com/user/EGarrett01

Enjoy the video! :D

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (tobyw87)

  • I am not sure what Martin's background his but I agree he is pretty good. :) As far as I know he's a graduate student studying evolution in Sweden originally from Canada. I posted the link of his channel up on the right. :) Kent Hovind can suck monkey nuts! :)

Video Responses

This video is a response to Kent Hovind Vs. Graduate Student (2 of 3)
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kent Hovind makes several mistakes not the least of which is combining facts with fiction. The danger in doing this is that it jeopordizes his main agnenda of coverting people to faith in Christ. Hie risks much in this approach and it could be said that he is the working working in conjuction with "negative" forces. What better way to hurt Christianity than to profess to be of faith yet portray your postion in part with inadequate and false information. The informed person will turn away.

  • @AbijahMichael so, believe this one thing, or rot in a burning torture for eternity? hmmm...sounds fair.

  • This is actually part 2.

  • Because Hovid doesn't understand what a proper analogy is. Hovind was comparing 2 completely different things. He compares a dynamic system (life) with a known static system (machines/buildings). It's obvious that's faulty parallelism.

    The grad student was making an accurate analogy. He said we don't have to see something directly to prove that it's real and then when on to state other things that we can't see that obviously exist, like electrons, and the nuclear fusion of stars.

  • nope

  • @3gdosrsfs agreed, he also stopped hovind from using an analogy, yet he did it and when hovind pulled him on it he said it's ok for him to do it..... the guy IS taking leaps of faith when he say's dragon flies, can be connected to platypus, were is the evidence, science is supposed to have some, before going around saying a whale evolved from a cow...(another evolutionist in another video)

  • who ever made this set of vids should just keep your opinion OFF the , it spoils the objectivity.

  • I think anyone with half a brain can clearly see that Hovind did indeed get owned.

  • ...right about what?...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more