The Case Of The Missing Stars

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us

A follow up to MoonFaker: Shifting Stars.


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Moon
• hoax
• Apollo
• 11
• stars
• Celestia
• MoonFaker
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[luciferisaplanet]

@ed4ed APOLLO pictures were not taken at night, otherwise the surface of the Moon would also be black, wouldn't it? So, why don't you go on and try: on a clear morning after sunrise, make a photo, or a video, which would show both the stars and the objects on Earth lit by the Sun.

[centurion180ad]

@MrHochstapler Some of what you are saying is correct for still photography shot at a principle that is highly luminous, or in glare.

Then there are all the stills and //hours// to TV Video of moonwalks or in Lunar orbit, where ALL large bright stars or planets and Milky Way ought to be clearly visible, but they are gone.

[centurion180ad]

@gazmological You have totally missed the point.

There was no way to fake a Star Field, which would not have been easily exposed as a hoax. You are correct that the distance from the earth to the moon would not change what the Star Field would have looked like, which is why it cannot be faked.

[gazmological]

This is BS! There would be absolutely no difference in the star field seen from the moon as opposed to the Earth. The distances of the stars to the Earth are so enormous there would be no difference in the 'Angularity '. The moon is only a quarter of a million miles away, which is nothing in comparison, so the assertion that they could not fake the stars is bunkem.

[GlowWorm1962]

More missing stars in watch?v=2okxZtWNaJI

Obviously a fake ROFL.

[wiiagent]

@ISamuelII thats wierd.... it has music now....

[ISamuelII]

@wiiagent No audio? I heard some Who and some old bubblegum pop aka Sweet.

[ISamuelII]

Everything about the "lunar lander" is bunk. Watch them decend, gluiding along at how fast?? Did they really slow down with bursts from the forward facing rockets without a jolt to the thing? Looking at the Saturn5, then the little box that took off from the "moon" jumping up to meet the "orbiting command mod",,, but they still can't hit a target in our own atmosphere with a rocket, as the star wars project-plot was supposed to do...

[wiiagent]

Are you aware that this video has no audio?

[MrHochstapler]

The answer is very simple: they are too faint. The Apollo photos are of brightly lit objects on the surface of the Moon, for which fast exposure settings were required. The fast exposures simply did not allow enough starlight into the camera to record an image on the film. The astronauts could have recorded star images in their photos by increasing exposures, but they were not there to take star pictures. The purpose of the photos was to record the astronauts' activities on the Moon.