Atheist

who was mark twain if not an atheist? Twain wrote, for example, "Faith is believing what you know ain't so", and "If Christ were here now there is one thing he would not be a Christian"

this video is going up the list of most discussed i think its better then the top video... hopefully people notice what bull they believe in and how it influences everybody. Stereotypes are never cool especially if they just wrong.

as soon as he is wrong

"it is pitilessly indifferent"

Ok its getting annoying. When are you guys going to stop repeating everything dawkins says and think

i sure dont have a lack of either, and im an atheist

"so it's just actors and actresses that have done good things? If that this all atheists got on that one, that really sucks"

Did you miss the long (incomplete) list of important scientists in the 1st part of the vid?

Not only that. go to looktothestars . org to see the long list of charities these actors give to.

so it's just actors and actresses that have done good things? If that this all atheists got on that one, that really sucks...

@mudnyoureyes

"I stated that science can not "prove" the non-existence of anything"

Nor does it even try. Why would it? There's no way to do so. Since there is ZERO evidence FOR the existence of a deity, that stands as sufficient in and of itself as a lack of need to investigate further. Why look for something that there is no science to infer its existence. Contrast that with CERN. The scientist there are looking for particles that have basis for existence. They are not seeking god.

I didn't mean that you, in general, cannot prove the existence of a god - just that, at this point in time, there is no evidence to support such an assertion. You can't prove something with no evidence and, right now, there is no evidence to support such a motion.

Youve misunderstood. I didnt remark that you said science has proven that there is no god. I stated that science can not "prove" the non-existence of anything. In baby-step # 2, you stated that You cannot prove the existence of a god. You are insinuating that proving the existence of anything, including god, is en necessarium, for the actual existence of anything. Bizarre? Yes. Illogical? No. It violates no laws of logic. My statement is valid and scientifically sound.