Vote No on 1 in Maine - Definition of Marriage

A post and response between a Yes on 1 supporter and a No on 1 supporter, broken down as a back and forth dialog. To me, this conversation comes down to a simple matter of loving or hating others To everyone in Maine watching this video, please vote No on 1, and make sure that everyone you know gets out to the voting booth and casts their vote against Question 1 so we can protect marriage equality in Maine and not see LGBT people suffer like me and others did last November in California.

Video: Sean Chapin

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• gay
• lesbian
• bisexual
• transgender
• maine
• marriage
• equality
• arrogance
• supremacy

[intolerancefighter]

@nnjhansen Your belief that all citizens are treated equally is pretty naive.

[intolerancefighter]

@nnjhansen so when you agree with the law , the law is just and true and valid and when you disagree with a law, it's "other such nonsense". We're all sorry you don't like the "new" marriage, but as you've said in so many other of your troll posts on the Internet, it's "majority rule", and this change is coming, whether you like it or not.

[intolerancefighter]

@nnjhansen But you said people getting married had to benefit the state, and they had to meet the requirements! Infertile heterosexual couples couldn't do that any more than a homosexual couple could. Hypocrisy all around! Fertility testing should be MANDATORY based on your assertions. Don't insult us with fallacy arguments about monetary costs. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

[intolerancefighter]

@nnjhansen there's nothing radical about adapting to change in our society. Only the fearful bandy about the word "radical".

[intolerancefighter]

@nnjhansen There is nothing radical about change. It seems radical to you because you are out of touch with other people's views, and want to dominate with your own.

[intolerancefighter]

@nnjhansen American couples go overseas because the process in America is broken and more expensive than alternatives. They want to be a parent and love a child NOW, not 10 years later when they are less positioned to do so. The DCF is America is corrupt and broken. Children in the DCF in America are in a TERRIBLE situation.

[intolerancefighter]

@nnjhansen I'm glad. I don't think the Catholic church should have anything to do with the welfare of children.

[nnjhansen]

No, it simply means that the state can place conditions and restrictions on marriage that are reasonably related to the state's legitimate interest in the institution.

[prolefeedprocessor]

About the whole pregnancy and childbirth thing: does this mean infertile couples and the elderly should not be married?

[nnjhansen]

I beg to differ, you have never answered my questions despite being asked numerous times.