The Strong Force: A Chat with Nobel Laureate David Gross

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,735
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 11, 2009

David Gross, the 2004 Nobel Laureate in Physics and the director of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at UC Santa Barbara, talks with veteran journalist Jerry Roberts about why scientists love KITP. [7/2009] [Science] [Show ID: 16805]

Category:

Education

Tags:

Download this video

LICENSE: Creative Commons (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works).

For more information about this license, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

High-quality MP4 Learn more

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @ActiveStorage Seemed the most appropriate response to the utter nonsense you posted. Not going to waste my time with well structured arguments for someone who's head is up their ass.

  • They really should deinterlace their videos.

see all

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why are the strong and weak forces necessarily distinct from electromagnetism? I see no reason for the physicists to make this unpleasant assumption based on my understandings of their experiments because the electromagnetic field created by charged particles has gravity of its own! At a small scale, couldn't this cause the 'net' gravity of the charged particle to be much greater than the repulsive electromagnetism?

  • @JackOfferlott :You dont get it, maybe the price doesn't cover all and is was biased by life and those who examine the stuff .But the Cermony is what is left from a victorian period and is grand and the only one left from history. other prizes are just crap in comparison.

  • Well well, I hope they don't loose ground and get wrapped up in the beauty of their equations. In the end, nature and not beauty decides whether a theory is correct or not.

  • The Nobel Prize isn't that impressive. Idiots who blindly buy the hype and have no idea about the actual work of its recipients are impressed with it. It's awarded politically by the Kingdom of Sweden, not even touching the subjective nature of gauging merit. The only people who find a Nobel impressive are those who can't think for themselves. What kind of prize is one that impresses people who can't think? Mathematically, String theory is weak at best. It isn't empirical nor falsifiable.

  • They did created a quantum computer, we are seeing it right now... literally, we are on it. Don't think so? check out Matrix is real (spin off video of original science show)

  • @slantythecamel sure sure. nothing to say. its ok lol

  • @slantythecamel nice strong well structured argument lol. what else can you say?

  • @ActiveStorage You're a moron.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more