Dennis Kucinich Goes on The O'Reilly Factor

Dennis treaded into the murky waters of the O'Reilly Factor to take on Bill-O over impeachment, and they actually found one thing they agree on, going after the Commodities Futures Trading Commission for the price of oil.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Bill
• O'Reilly
• Factor
• Dennis
• Kucinich
• Impeachment
• Oil
• Prices
• CFTC

[Ddstairclimber]

impeach Bill O'reilly.

[rmccay88]

@DONGOE

I agree about the Windfall profits tax part but you are a fool to say he doesn't care about the U.S. I don't agree with Dennis on many things but I respect him a lot because he is one of a few members in government who doesn't belong to CFR and isn't a corporate owned politician. He truly speaks his mind. If Republicans actually did the same thing besides Ron Paul, this country would be in much better shape.

[DemonDrummer1018]

@rmccay88 very true

[iihippoii]

O'Reilly says "get me the smoking gun. If you can't get'em you don't have it." What the hell???? He supports the Iraq invasion without a smoking gun. Wish this loser could take some of his own medicine. This guy is scary nuts.

[DONGOE]

Dennis Kucinich doesn't care about The United States and its people.

A Windfall Profits Tax on the big oil companies will be passed along to the people, you fool. It is just another way of taking the people's money. Call it a tax, a fee, a license, a penalty, a fine...they are all forms of tax.

He is part of the group that is trying to impose the Socialist, Marxist agenda on the people of the United States.

[ADEAL416]

And once again, when used properly, as it is by El Al, it is not practiced to the exclusion of all other factors besides statistics, as I have illustrated to you. Again, if that were all we used, I would agree with you, but the countries that try to be politically correct in protecting their citizens will ALWAYS pay the price. I don't want to pay that price a second time. Once was more than enough

[ADEAL416]

Statistics would disagree with you, my friend, and they don't lie. Nations that use racial profiling have never had successful attacks against them--those that don't have. Not everything is simple, but this, sir, is. While I haven't read 1984 so was unfamiliar with the quote you mentioned, I'm aware of the premise, and you are wrong about its "warning". The point was that the "threats" in that book were FABRICATED as a means of holding on to power. The threats we face are REAL. No comparison

[ADEAL416]

I never said there was "total cooperation"--I said if Saddam actually had the WMD's our intelligence at the time said he did, don't think for a second that he would have hesitated to hook Al-Qaida up with some of their own. Sure he denied them entry into Iraq--that would be too blatant a connection, and then he wouldn't have any plausible deniabiliy when held accountable. But that doesn't preclude under the table dealings in weapons meant for use against a mutual enemy

[ADEAL416]

If they couldn't keep secret those three cases, how do you figure they kept it secret in countless others? As to the "as a whole" comment, that depends what you mean--if you mean is it the most effective method, no it's not, and I never claimed it to be. But if you mean did it EVER save lives, the answer is a resounding YES, acknowledged even by those like Blair who generally oppose its use. Knowing this, we sure as hell better leave it on the table for the cases where nothing else works