A Closer Look at The Gable Film-Michigan Dogman

Thanks to MichaelSGoldermann for letting me use his video

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• bigfoot
• mothman
• ghost

[moleman1961]

Chuck Norris in a suite!

[Phil498]

@moleman1961 lol

[TurtlesAreCool13]

not a werewolf, werewolf is man-wolf. i dont see any man attributes on it. big wolf/dog?

[Phil498]

i dog would move four legs,not front two then the hind legs

[spikewerewolf]

interesting, have you seen part 2 (maybe it was you who sent it to me)

[Phil498]

it might have been me,i forget

[jtw1113]

good video dude,you seam to be the only person who's trying to figure that thing out and a good close up like that...you can definitely rule out c.g.i!

[jim93000]

I agree. The first time I saw the clip I thought it was a man in a suit moving much like a gorilla, then as it started to charge it seemed to change into what looked like a bull but moving almost like a cat. Mad video, fake or not it's still scary.

[keyfinder257]

I think the narrator's comments about variable morphology is quite interesting (shape changing). And for those of you who think it's nonsense, try explaining the Empire State building to a chimpanzee. There are things in this universe more intellectually and technologically advanced than we. Word. Is this "dogman" a creation of such beings? Highly doubtful, but not impossible. North American indians were absolutely obsessed with shape changers, perhaps for a reason other than shared legends.

[keyfinder257]

I assume, nastymonsters2, that you are speaking to the person who responded to my observations. FYI: whenever you decide to call someone an idiot, it's probably a good idea to use correct grammar. "You're" is the contraction you meant, unless "your" a provocateur. If you are, then I am reacting to your "bait," which is a pointless endeavor. Cryptozoology is not a religion, BTW. It's more "hard" science than much of what is published in peer reviewed journals these days.

[nastymonsters2]

@keyfinder257 again your an idiot...seek help you  have mental problems

[nastymonsters2]

@keyfinder257 your an idiot...

[Worley1971]

Thats my x wife  :)

[keyfinder257]

Yes, thank you for the kind replies. I know you are very probably right; however, it's worth not being naive about these things. Just because someone "admits a hoax" does not disqualify intriguing footage. The Patterson film is a perfect case in point. Everyone and their mother crawled out of the woodwork to "admit" they hoaxed it. That film has never been conclusively disproved by any stretch. As for this one, I have no idea. The final fake parts could have been added later. Happy holidays!

[nastymonsters2]

@keyfinder257 no its a man in a suit ...go search the full footage on here..already admitted a fake.

[keyfinder257]

Legs seem too short for a man in a suit. Also, the position of spine seems akimbo in relation to shoulders and upper arms. More consistent with nonhuman primate orientation. Very gorilla-like with some admittedly canine variations in some poses, although the head does not appear to have a snout, at least from what I can see.

[keyfinder257]

This footage is intriguing. The movement of the subject is not consistent with that of a bear, at least according to my familiarity with ursine physiognomy. Rather, it seems apelike, and not doglike at all. It reminds me of a large gorilla more than anything else. The head is quite small for the body, however. On the small chance this is NOT a hoax, I would gravitate towards the likelihood of a primate subject. Maimed footage of a torso in some accounts quite fake, a red herring.