Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
WOw soundsfromnothing, shut up. I didnt even read what you said but damn you idoit why would you post fuckin 6 posts. DAMN. Some one should sock you in the face for real
used for Georgians). The theory of "Aegean" ppls being the ancestors of the Britions is scientifically proven false. It was proposed early on, but dna (& other discrepencies) make it null. Too add to the confusion, Cro Magnon peoples (right around the same time that the middle easterners-"mediteraneans"-fir st began arriving in N. Africa) migrated down from Spain into N. Africa (especially the Canary Islands). The Guanches of today carry much of their DNA. So the
Iberians/Basques/Picts would have been related to other Europeans on both sides anyway. As far as neanderthal Dna goes, modern humans have none. This makes sense too. There's very few times in nature, where a hybrid species can reproduce. For example, a male donkey can mate w/ a female horse & create a mule. If the mule is male, he WILL be sterile. If the mule is female (called a Hinny), 99% of the time, IT will be sterile. why should it be
any different for us humans?? The neanderthal dna genome was recently fully mapped. It is completely different from ours. I do believe that some neanderthals & Cro Mags mated; I just don't believe any hybrids can be found in our genes (science backs this). Concerning grains, the oldest
grains ever found were in the middle east. Every grain on earth is said to have descended from those. You're right though..tame grain mutations allowed for easier gathering of grains & of course, made cultivation much easier as well. Either way the same thing appears just before (or just at) the neolithic (in N. Africa-including egypt). That matches
the migrational patterns of those middle easterners there as well. Regarding teh Indo Europeans, remember that it is a language group, not necessarily a physical (human) one. Besides, some scientists/sociologists/antrho pologists contradict themselves; Europeans (and middle easterners as well) could not have all risen out of the caucasus mtns, if European CRo Magnons
EVOLVED in Europe. We have Morphological evidence of Cro Magnon evolution (from Africans) there. That's why I don't buy the whole "caucasoid" race theory. It's not accurate (but-yet- many still subscribe to it). That has caused nothing but misunderstanding for European descendents trying to learn their ancestry. I'd say the genetic studies (being performed now, as well as those dna alleles discovered in the last 5 years) are more on the mark.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
used for Georgians). The theory of "Aegean" ppls being the ancestors of the Britions is scientifically proven false. It was proposed early on, but dna (& other discrepencies) make it null. Too add to the confusion, Cro Magnon peoples (right around the same time that the middle easterners-"mediteraneans"-fir st began arriving in N. Africa) migrated down from Spain into N. Africa (especially the Canary Islands). The Guanches of today carry much of their DNA. So the
Iberians/Basques/Picts would have been related to other Europeans on both sides anyway. As far as neanderthal Dna goes, modern humans have none. This makes sense too. There's very few times in nature, where a hybrid species can reproduce. For example, a male donkey can mate w/ a female horse & create a mule. If the mule is male, he WILL be sterile. If the mule is female (called a Hinny), 99% of the time, IT will be sterile. why should it be
any different for us humans?? The neanderthal dna genome was recently fully mapped. It is completely different from ours. I do believe that some neanderthals & Cro Mags mated; I just don't believe any hybrids can be found in our genes (science backs this). Concerning grains, the oldest
grains ever found were in the middle east. Every grain on earth is said to have descended from those. You're right though..tame grain mutations allowed for easier gathering of grains & of course, made cultivation much easier as well. Either way the same thing appears just before (or just at) the neolithic (in N. Africa-including egypt). That matches
the migrational patterns of those middle easterners there as well. Regarding teh Indo Europeans, remember that it is a language group, not necessarily a physical (human) one. Besides, some scientists/sociologists/antrho pologists contradict themselves; Europeans (and middle easterners as well) could not have all risen out of the caucasus mtns, if European CRo Magnons
EVOLVED in Europe. We have Morphological evidence of Cro Magnon evolution (from Africans) there. That's why I don't buy the whole "caucasoid" race theory. It's not accurate (but-yet- many still subscribe to it). That has caused nothing but misunderstanding for European descendents trying to learn their ancestry. I'd say the genetic studies (being performed now, as well as those dna alleles discovered in the last 5 years) are more on the mark.