procharged V6 vs GTO vs Mach 1
Top Comments
All Comments (537)
-
@bharsen Like i said he must not have boost and the 80's supra had 240Bhp and 190-210whp and is a 14-15sec 1/4 from the Factory. so it will be even with the Camaro V6 he was loosing boost somewhere due to a Faulty Turbo.
-
and your friends MK3 doesn't have 300WHP if it got smoked by a stock V6 camaro
-
a turbo MK3 would go pretty even.... but you have to look at what you are comparing, a 1986 platform vs a brand new 2011.... I would hope they have the technology to FINALLY keep up with something from 1986
the MK3 also came out in the 80's... pretty much the slowest decade for cars in history since the 60's
apples and oranges IMO
-
@bharsen then my Friend Kenny's Mk3 wasnt boosting right then. cause he lost to one.
-
uhhh, no... I'm a GM guy at heart but I'm also a realist, the new V6 camaro run mid 14's on average... a stock turbo MKIV supra would embarrass the new camaro from any speed
-
@iiRockJayys tell that to the V6 powered Camaro. It can smoke a 300hp supra off the show room floor
-
@neolexington Haha GM is still in business ya silly lil goose ;)
-
@iiRockJayys umm? a LOT of people do. like a LOT. chekc youtube. theres hundreds of people putting turbos and superchargers on v6s, they are lighter than v8. sure they dont have the power at first but they have the potential. if you take the time and build it right, they will burn the shit out of anything you can find pretty much.
-
Just a wast of money a girl car
-
@neolexington ha boy you have to have a vagina to be driving your awesome stock honda hatch with 150 hp
@neolexington
this proves what in a car discussion?
Plymouth has been out of business for decades and still manages to embarrass new cars with their 440 six pack powered muscle cars
bharsen 5 months ago 4
I've learned two things from this video.
1.) The pro-charged v6 Mustang is relatively slow.
2.) Never stick the camera out the window.
georgetek 11 months ago 3