911 Live footage - smoking gun of Explosives
Uploader Comments (antiklaus)
Top Comments
-
they was turned to dust ,how do you explain that, and the pancake theory wouldnt stand up in court ,it would get laughed out ,the collapse would have taken longer ,l dont pretend to know what happened but it wasnt the pancake theory
-
Youtube-9/11 total proof bombs were planted in the building.
All Comments (127)
-
George Bush younger brother was head of security for the WTC buildings that is most likely how the bombs and other devices were planted weeks and months before 9 eleven.There was odd fire drills that cleared floors to make this possible and if i didnt believe or know this i would still see the buildings explode or implode i dont know how anyone can not see them expecially building 7 no plane hit it i dont care to convince you non believers yall are on your own you blithering idiots
-
Oh, My God, My God! God bless Dr. Mark Heath and those who risked death to help the victims. Oh, my God....
-
I can't believe this is stairing everyone right in the face and We still argue over it. Look at the debris Field on the ground everywhere. That is exploded concrete, and then also take note of the solid matter mixed in .... exploded Paperwork and office supplies. We don't NEED another Investigation.. We NEED a prosecuting Forum and the first 2 Defendants should Be Silverstien and the Mayor. Crack those 2 nuts and the rest of the Story will come to light.
-
This video is fail. No evidence of explosives. Give it a rest already.
-
Bush is sitting on his fucking Texas ranch right now thinking "Hahaha, boy did I seem convincing about that whole ordeal. HAHA, THEY ALL BELIEVED ME!"
Biggest load of human debris ever created.
-
You almost don't catch it. But the Report of another explosion was mentioned near the end.
-
u r all fuck heads
-
This was long planned long before Bush ever got into office. People forgot all about the first attack in 93. Clinton was in office then.
-
Great reply. Took the words right off my key board.



but once you understand the implications of 3-6, it makes you ask yourself whether 1 and 2 really satisfy your initial response. Thats what makes you look further, instead of doing what most people do, that is, throw their arms up in the air and say i dont know, no can ever say for sure, and since they dont understand the importance of getting past that first part, they give up because it doesnt really seem to be that important anyways.
SexskillAndEbert 3 years ago
I try to steer all discussions of WTC7 to the observed evidence for the very reasons you outline. It's all semantics, and the shills LOVE to argue semantics because there is no way to win such an argument.
If you look at the fact that evaporated steel was found by the NIST investigators in the rubble of WTC7, then you have an excellent starting point. There is no way to explain this with fire or fuel explosions.
Also is significant that despite this and NFPA requirements to do so *cont*
antiklaus 3 years ago
*cont* the NIST investigators broke the law and refused to do investigation for thermite residue.
Honsetly, that little gem shows that they were out to hide something from the start.
They intentionally destroyed steel that showed evidence of evaporation, and they refused to investigate the source of such damage.
Those two facts alone warrant a criminal investigation.
antiklaus 3 years ago 2
its like spam, you fall for it a few times, and then before long despite wanting to believe that the incredibly hot chick actually is real and wants to meet you, you sadly realize its just another hoax. and before long, like any half-way intelligent person, you stop wasting your time. don take it personal antiK, i thank you for posting the john o'neil video.
SexskillAndEbert 3 years ago
Look, I think one of the weakest elements of our movement is that we don't encourage anyone to actually investigate and understand what they are seeing and hearing.
Too many of our community are drawn into bad videos because they accept bad science without understanding it. We can't spoon feed our community if we expect them to hold their own against the shills.
There is proof in this video - in the first few seconds. Hints: Look at the arcs of the debris, and listen closely.
antiklaus 3 years ago