NASA's global warming dispute

Brit Hume discusses different views by NASA scientists Griffin and Hansen.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• global
• warming
• climate
• change
• nasa
• griffin
• hansen

[shavedape777]

I don't care about frogs. Now shut up.

[SuperAtheist]

ash4432

1st humans are NOT destroying the earth.

we don't have that much influence.

2nd even if every nuclear warhead were detonated, the earth would NOT be destroyed.

3rd if global warming were happening & it was because of humans, at worse we are only causing the extinction of ourselves & other species but the earth will be just fine.

4th through out most of the earth's life, conditions have NOT been suitable for human life. What makes you think it has to stay suitable?

[SuperAtheist]

hanson is an arrogant idiot

[ash4432]

he.s the best. we are destroying this earth...

[Richinator2000]

Griffin is an idiot

[dstraycat]

Gaud... You really need to go back to school. During the Medieval Warm period the global temperature was 4 Degrees warmer than it is today and we still have polar bears and bees and frogs... Are you just deranged or what...??? During the Little Ice Age The temp was about 3 degrees colder than it is today and we had the French revolution... Washington had a bitch of time getting across the Delaware due to the ICE jams... Get serious and go back to school...

[dstraycat]

Gaud... You really need to go back to school. During the Medieval Warm period the global temperature was 4 Degrees warmer than it is today and we still have polar bears and bees and frogs... Are you just deranged or what...??? During the Little Ice Age The temp was about 3 degrees colder than it is today and we had the French revolution... Washington had a bitch of time getting across the Delaware due to the ICE jams... Get serious and go back to school...

[AgnesBojaxhiu2000]

the gop and the rushies will tell you that for life to cease ... that temperatures must get to at least 120 degrees f .. another 50 degrees higher at least ... but the loss of the amphibians after temperatures have only risen 0.25 degrees is nearly impossible ... but there is no other explanation ... skin cancer was the bullet ... but global warming was the trigger ... and the same for the bee ... temperatures have just barely began to rise and already they take off

[thecaster]

Loss of amphibians is sketchy, and no, polar bear populations have not declined (in fact, mainly, exploded in some parts, and stayed constant in others). As for the recent CCD concerning bees—there is no evidence that it is due to global warming. You can't attribute anything natural and bad you don't like to global warming.

And yes, the environment does change, and has changed QUITE much, regardless of human intervention or not.

[AgnesBojaxhiu2000]

the gop and the rushies will tell you that the loss of the amphibians due to global warming means nothing ... same for the polar bear and the pollinator bee ... but others will tell you that the loss of all amphibians is a significant because it shows that life is only possible in our environment which cannot be changed very much ... still others will not believe that the amphibians were killed by global warming and have not googled 'global warming frog' .. and never want to