Uploader Comments (kingscrusher)
Top Comments
-
When I was four I swallowed 2 pawns and was working on a rook when my parents stopped me.
-
4 years old. impressive!
Video Responses
All Comments (52)
-
4 yrs old?? no way! really???
-
amazing
-
hm i don't think he was very good.
-
Very good game!
btw, I think Capa could have avoided the use of Queen at all. If he played Bf3 instead of Qf3, it would have been same situation. Though it seems Capa wanted to end the game quickly with encouraging Ramon to trade material and secure the win.
-
people, the point of this is that even at the age of four, capablanca understands how to use his pieces.
-
capa was the most talented in his time, as well as fischer, kasparov, etc...in theire respective era...
now i think magnus carlsen is the best...
-
Actually, capa did have a queen; his opponent did not.
For 4 years old, it is very impressive play anyway. Most 4 year olds couldn't even ride a bike...
-
yes but you cant say capa was the most talented i mean you are right this was incredible, but i dont know when fisher started but when he would have done exactly the same as capa i think fisher would have been as good, i think even better.... but i dont know why you said capa created counterplay white didnt have any play at all, and i have no clue why he gave up the queen he didnt seem to be able to do anything without it but you are still right capa was incredible
-
how do yoiu know?
-
That's totally a mismatch. Capablanca was already four years old. Ramon Iglesias should have challenged him when he was two or at least while he was still unable to speak Spanish.
hmm its a great win at that age but i think it is a bit much to give him credit for thinking positionally when making his moves. i mean its still good that he can do this at 4 but i think youre being a bit biased here tyfon.
it would have been impressive if he'd played a simple combination or something - like taking away a defender to win a pawn.
i think this shows understanding of taking pieces but little more.
trixapete 3 years ago
I think there was clear evidence of positional understanding, and actually *NOT* playing too "concretely" (tactically). E.g. not playing Nxd2, but instead playing Nd4. It was the positional moves which impressed me, and at the very end, the central king, is a clue to the hallmark of Capablanca's later endgame genius. It is evidence he knew when the king was becoming strong, and was quick to activate it. The positional stuff impressed me, especially the final king activation.
kingscrusher 3 years ago