Magic, or Proton Created Before Your Eyes!

Neal Adams demonstrates how Prime Matter particles collect to make protons and neutrons. http://www.nealadams.com/morescience.html

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Conspiracy
• of
• Science
• proton
• neutron
• space
• Earth
• science
• history
• prime
• matter
• magic
• conspiracy
• NASA
• ufo

[sheepneck69]

aarrrgh my head exploded, did not get any of that!

[nealadamsdotcom]

@sheepneck69 Watch my other dozen videos

[DarknessHowls]

What is the experimental evidence for these "prime matter particles? Explain what you mean when you say "force flows", because that makes no sense given the definition of force.

These are big claims; if magnetic field lines leave "prime matter particles" without forming closed loops, then there is a non-zero magnetic flux and you are claiming to have discovered a magnetic monopole, which is something you'll have to back up with a lot of falsifiable theory and reproducible experimental evidence.

[nealadamsdotcom]

@DarknessHowls You think so? An Electron is a Monopole.

Bad? A positron is a Monopole! Prove me wrong. You can't.

2. An ATOM is a complete field. It MUST BE doesn't it? Electron into Nuclei. Nuclei to Electron. Yet some FIELD/attraction escapes,....and we call it Gravity!

Field "flows".?!

[DarknessHowls]

@nealadamsdotcom - An electron is an electrical monopole, yes. You are claiming to have found a magnetic monopole, however, which is not the same thing. Also, now fields "flow" too? Sorry, but the way you're talking about things does not seem compatible with what the mathematical/physical concept of a force field actually represents. Could you clarify what exactly you mean by fields or forces "flowing"?

[nealadamsdotcom]

@DarknessHowls - An electron is a monopole and a positron is a monopole, tell me what's wrong with that.

You're asking me to explain something that no one understands completely. I will tell you what it seems like. It seems as though there is a flow toward a positron. It seems as though there is a flow away from an electron, and yet at the same time, the flow remains attached to the causative pole. Like gravity, magnetism, the strong force, and the electro weak force.

[nealadamsdotcom]

@DarknessHowls - To clarify. In the primitive beginning universe, there was 1 force. I don't believe it really did much of anything. It just held the universe stable. Then something, (perhaps spin), pulled at the universe, forced it apart. But in Planck-sized fields. Each field pulling to close and re-join yet being pulled apart. This pulling apart and pulling together was and remains the only force in the universe. There is 1 force not 4. The only force. The universe is stupid.

[rongrite]

On cosmic rays and pair production;

thunder storms are known to produce gamma rays.

The idea is, that clouds are like fuel cells, combining hydrogen and oxygen, and producing rain and lightning.

More evidence has just been discovered, that gamma rays may also be formed in just a hydrogen/oxygen reaction!

(Neal, you got to see this!)

watch?v=jC_-6XgeqJo

[rongrite]

What if electron and positrons were little monopole magnets?

The flow of the magnets is electricity, and spreads the range of their magnetic fields, along the line of conduction. Static electricity would be the cumulative effect of an abundance, or lack of electrons, stationary around an object. Gravity would be the slight attraction from positrons in atoms, to the electrons in the shells of other atoms. i wonder what the effects of a concentration of positrons would be? Anti-static electricity?

[DarknessHowls]

@nealadamsdotcom - As per the monopole question: Electric "poles" (positive and negative charge) are one type of thing. Electrical monopoles (isolated +/- charges) are found in nature. Magnetic poles (North or South charge) are another type of thing. We have only seen pairs of N/S poles in nature; never an isolated N or S pole. Thus, we say magnetic monopoles do not exist (though many physicists have a gut feeling that they should exist, and are searching very hard for them).

[DarknessHowls]

@nealadamsdotcom - What you say sounds nice, but how do you know it is true? An idea sounding good or making sense to you is not sufficient evidence of its validity. In physics, careful experiment and measurement are the arbiters of truth, not one's cleverly crafted arguments. So, what falsifiable predictions does your hypothesis make? And have they been rigorously tested by experiment?