Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Radiometric Dating Doesn't Work! (for stupid people)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,295
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 24, 2008

Childhood indoctrination at it's worst:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J38zrPZED50

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 65 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ShwaNerd)

  • yes they are consistent. consistently wrong chicken boy. also why dont they simply go back there and get sample that are homogenous and stop creationists in there tracks once and for all. maybe they are chikennnnnn. like you sort of

  • You're funny. I laughed. or clucked. I'm a chicken.

    Find any bunnies in precambrian rock yet? Then stfu n00b

  • haha i still remember that voice hey its lucky from bia? remember you member

  • Wow; it really is a small world. Yes I remember you... but do YOU remember ME? Who do you think I was back then? Is bia even still around lol.

  • you're canadian! i found you through irishs video

    and no i dont think so the website is down and stuff

  • Irish has videos too? Send me his channel!

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Not bad, but I think a lot of people missed the point. I lol-ed, sort of.

  • your freeking weird.  right but weird..

  • Thank you for this video. Now I can respond to my stupid ass Born Again Christian Fundamentalist Idiot brother in law who tried to feed me this bull about Mt. St. Helens.

  • @yetiwestin NO, there are no trees in the precambrian rock, they hadn't evolved yet.

  • This kid is annoying...

  • @ShwaNerd no but theres trees runnign through your so called precambrian rocks... that extend all the way up to the cenozoic era. How long does a dead tree stay standing in your neighborhood?

  • If something of KNOWN age can't be dated cause it's not old enough, then the dating method just can't be trusted. So that means no scientist knows if that is precambrian layers or not.

  • @ShwaNerd the video was "removen by the user" halarious. also, a good vid to debunk would be "radiometric dating flaws (pottasium argon)"

  • I'm viewer number 777 :-)

  • Joyness.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more