The Truth And Lies Of 911 - Michael Ruppert (2004)

http://www.fromthewilderness.com | This pioneering, groundbreaking expose of 9-11, now two years old, painted a stark and accurate picture of our world today and TOMMORROW. Mike's new introduction "connects the dots." Other search word: Conpiracy

Michael Ruppert: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ruppert

Mike Ruppert - CIA and Drug Running (1997): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rFWDHQcIG8

American Drug War: The Last White Hope: Pre Release Cut - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CyuBuT_7I4

http://www.trueworldhistory.info | http://cms.ae911truth.org
http://www.truthaction.org | http://www.wearechange.org
http://www.infowars.com | http://restoretherepublic.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Michael
• Ruppert
• 911
• NWO
• Gorge
• W.
• Bush
• Dick
• Cheney
• War
• Games

[lawsarejusttogovern]

Watched this in 2002, changed my life forever. Thank you Mike :)

[TheZoider]

Wow!!!!!!

[lawsarejusttogovern]

@Avidcomp That's interesting when I get the time next month I will investigate those claims and see if they hold true if so then my opinion may change. Until then there is not enough conclusive evidence proving like wise. At the moment I consider it speculation. Again that does not rule out that it could be factual.

[Avidcomp]

@lawsarejusttogovern On the clip you sent me go to 0:17:20 and watch how they talk about the line of the bullet. Now go to my clip /watch?v=DPjpd90Z9rg at begin at 1:19:20 and note the seating position. There.. no need for the "magic bullet" conspiracy.

[lawsarejusttogovern]

@Avidcomp Here is a good film on JFK, /watch?v=DAQ5mFkrlDs

[ANDREWOFPR2]

Never Forget ------ Investigate 911------

[thefakeyeti]

If it weren't for mindless usage of gas...

I could see POTENTIALLY fighting for oil, however, it is hard for me to get behind war for resources when we use those resources for FUN..

Hell, how much petroleum do we use simply so we can drink pop?

[Innadiated]

@Avidcomp Yes, his actual material doesn't start until about 20mins in or so. The first portion is just an explanation on the difference between presenting a factual solid case, or one based on speculation. This sets a strong tone for the rest of the film in regards to the fact-based nature (which is essentially court-room quality) of the presentation.

[Avidcomp]

@Innadiated okay. I'll watch the whole thing when I have time before making more comments (if indeed I even feel the need to) I just reacted to exactly what he said and he said as I posted in my last comment, but that (albeit out of context) comment of his at the point is incorrect, hence I became doubtful of anything further to come. My mouth is shut until I've seen the whole programme. I do recommend the BBC doc if you're interested.

[Innadiated]

@Avidcomp This isn't a doc on JFK. He is describing whats in the video. The REASON why he's showing it is to tell you WHY he's not showing building 7's collapse. 

[Avidcomp]

@Innadiated Really? But he says that the bullet came from the front and not as the government says, from behind