Upload

4195: The Final F-22 Raptor

LockheedMartinVideos LockheedMartinVideos·480 videos
23,054

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
180,298
Like     Dislike 50

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like LockheedMartinVideos's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike LockheedMartinVideos's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add LockheedMartinVideos's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Dec 13, 2011

Commemorating the production of the final F-22 Raptor, number 4195, with a look a back from the people behind the development of the aircraft.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • 88mroux

    We need more F-22s !187 F-22 Raptors is not enough!

    · 24

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.
  • minuteman3

    You never know what the future may hold. Today we may be fighting the Taliban, but tomorrow you never know. You always plan for every eventual contingency. Besides, I would rather spend $20 Billion on this, because it furthers technology, manufacturing, and puts people to work than spend $100 Billion on Welfare.

    · 11

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate minuteman3's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate minuteman3's comment.
    in reply to Zaid Mousa (Show the comment)

All Comments (943)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • polyrhythmic1

    We should have built about 300 more of these. Thanks to Obama, the production was cancelled. 187 isn't enough...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate polyrhythmic1's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate polyrhythmic1's comment.
  • 88mroux

    About one-third of the F-22’s current maintenance activity is associated with the stealth system, including the skin. It is important to recognize the F-22 currently meets or exceeds its maintenance requirements, and the operational capability of the F-22 is outstanding, in part due to its stealth system.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.
    in reply to jean-michel HERBERT (Show the comment)
  • 88mroux

    Fact: Stealth is a breakthrough system capability and it requires regular maintenance, just like electronics or hydraulics. The skin of the F-22 is a part of the stealth capability and it requires routine maintenance.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.
    in reply to jean-michel HERBERT (Show the comment)
  • 88mroux

    Facts: The F-22 is required to achieve 12.0 direct maintenance man-hours per flight hour (DMMH/FH) at system maturity, which is defined to be when the F-22 fleet has accumulated 100,000 flight hours. In 2008 the F-22 achieved 18.1 DMMH/FH which then improved to 10.5 DMMH/FH in 2009. It’s important to recognize this metric is to be met at system maturity, which is projected to occur in late 2010. So the F-22 is better than the requirement well before maturity.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.
    in reply to jean-michel HERBERT (Show the comment)
  • 88mroux

    Facts: The F-22 is an all-weather fighter and rain is not an issue. The F-22 is currently based and operating in the harshest climates in the world ranging from the desert in Nevada and California, to extreme cold in Alaska, and rain/humidity in Florida, Okinawa and Guam. In all of these environments the F-22 has performed extremely well.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.
    in reply to jean-michel HERBERT (Show the comment)
  • 88mroux

    Facts: The F-22s that were most recently delivered have a flyaway cost of $142.6M each, which is the cost to build and deliver each aircraft. This number does not include the costs for research and development (that were incurred since 1991), military construction to house the aircraft, or operations and maintenance costs.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.
    in reply to jean-michel HERBERT (Show the comment)
  • F22raptor46

    On what grounds are you even saying it was never meant to be a 1vs1 dogfighter?? So your saying they added stealth, high T/W ratio (better than all the Flankers) and the TVC and supermaneuverability and then said "the F-22 was never built to dogfight". Ok then please explain why it is winning every simulated air war in 1 vs 1 gunfights, it is just owning one plane after the other, please explain why this is happening???

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate F22raptor46's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate F22raptor46's comment.
    in reply to TheSoviet1987 (Show the comment)
  • maydayfire

    only good for airshows..

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate maydayfire's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate maydayfire's comment.
  • AmazingTNT

    Woah! Why so rude all of a sudden? I was adding another feature onto your list! Sidewinders (Along with the HMCS) can do some damage in dog-fighting....

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AmazingTNT's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate AmazingTNT's comment.
    in reply to em745a (Show the comment)
  • 88mroux

    Were you watching Why the F-22 was cancelled by the Washington Post?! If you were then you're listening to the wrong people. They are anti-realistic about the world pretty much! Watch the video titled "F22 Raptor WP report = incorrect ."

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 88mroux's comment.
    in reply to jean-michel HERBERT (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later