If you didn't say that then the point doesn't apply to you then I guess. I just thought it was relevant (maybe I was jumping the gun a little).
I've had this name online since I was about 10 and it's never taken on any website I go to so I stuck with it. That probably implies I'm quite young so I'm 18.
Besides the state let's people mess up financially all the time.
There is no effective legislation currently to stop people taking out too many consumer loans and being unable to repay them, other than the incentive to try not to let that happen.
What I mean (sorry if I seem aggressive, just trying to join the discussion) is that if the state should be deemed as the right entity to be forcing people into financial situations which are good for them, they would have to actually have some advantage over other possibilities. For example, if people weren't sure what was the best way to invest, they could ask a respected financial advisor.
omg, i just realized that shawn and the mystic look a lot alike. The mystic looks like shawn in hollywood makeup. lol. TOO FUNNEE!!!
pairunoyd 2 years ago
silver4shawn
skimpapotamus 2 years ago
By the way this didn't really turn into a discussion. It's quite hard to maintain friendliness when communicating through text.
I am a subscriber of yours and will continue to be.
sharperguy 2 years ago
If you didn't say that then the point doesn't apply to you then I guess. I just thought it was relevant (maybe I was jumping the gun a little).
I've had this name online since I was about 10 and it's never taken on any website I go to so I stuck with it. That probably implies I'm quite young so I'm 18.
sharperguy 2 years ago
well said
auamoti 2 years ago
Well that is the point of the state, really.
But the way I see it is either you let people make possibly bad decisions or you don't. The latter would involve force.
sharperguy 2 years ago
Besides the state let's people mess up financially all the time.
There is no effective legislation currently to stop people taking out too many consumer loans and being unable to repay them, other than the incentive to try not to let that happen.
sharperguy 2 years ago
What I mean (sorry if I seem aggressive, just trying to join the discussion) is that if the state should be deemed as the right entity to be forcing people into financial situations which are good for them, they would have to actually have some advantage over other possibilities. For example, if people weren't sure what was the best way to invest, they could ask a respected financial advisor.
sharperguy 2 years ago
What makes you think the state would be any better at making the decisions than say, a private financial advisory organisation?
sharperguy 2 years ago
Agree completely 5 stars
sharperguy 2 years ago