Conflict/Confusion: Do we need a Grand Unified Theorem? 5/5
Top Comments
All Comments (34)
-
well done
-
cool this is not for you
-
sorry the word should be grasp not graff. n the last part of what i wrote means that " finally we will save others by saving our selves. that is if if we grasp the truth which is love.
i hope i have expressed better now. thanks.
-
HUH?! WHAT?!
-
the plain truth can not be corrupted. love is truth n truth is love. to graff it means u graff love n finally will we save so we be saved.
-
r u sure u studied physics...?..its nothing new here.
-
He has a very dynamic book, explaining his theory filled with math. I doubt if you would understand it if you had it.
-
lolx...
-
I repeat
-
no offense bro, but if u realize when he was explaining the fundamental of GUT,he was repeating it again and again...and i can assure u that it was the basic of physics and already accepted generally.. not GUT at all...
Mathematical proof is needed in order to confirm the theoretical part of physics.
HMMM...
What noble prize were YOU nominated for???
Dumbass...
Lmfao, shut the hell-up. Nobody cares what YOU studied (if you studied it at all). You cant do jack shit with it. It cracks me up when sudo intellectuals wannabes (and im doing you a favor by even puting intellectual by you name) try to critique a master work such as this, when it obvously giving you a brain freeze. So go listen to hannity and dumb down some more, and leave this stuff to the really smart people...
LMFAO!
dreckka 3 years ago 7
I reall don't think knowledge like this should even get into the hands of euros because you know how it ends up being used...
KamauAmani 3 years ago 6