Did a 757 really hit the pentagon on 911?

facts that there wasn't a plane that hit the pentagon

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• conspiracies

[llanbo]

@dycl7788

Yes, obviously they managed an incredible conspiracy that no one has blown the whistle on from the inside, managed to fool all those people into thinking they saw a 757 when it was really a missile, yet when it came to the simple task of planting the correct landing gear they screwed right up. Same as when they forgot to make a roadrunner-style 757 shaped hole in the side of the Pentagon. It's always the little details that ruin a fiendish plan, isn't it?

[dycl7788]

It's a preset airplane maybe not a the 757...anybody take a measurement of those burned-up landing gears by distance, maybe they are stupid enough by just posting wrong landing gears.

[dycl7788]

Take a good look at the picture that showed all the landing gears ( five of them ) are out-side of the wall, which means the 757 lowed-down its landing gearsto increase the speed and attack ...?????????????????????????? It's a man-made...can you see...?

[MJB919]

@wellifthemediasaysit Your reply doesn't even make any sense. I answered every single question you asked me and I have given you facts and links to back them up. All you have done so far is throw childish insults. You still have yet to present anything to back up your claims, which proves that you really have no argument.

[wellifthemediasaysit]

@MJB919 great, so the wings didnt 'shear off,hit the ground, fold back, 'vaporise', ...please pick one and stick to it!!! stupid paid cointelpro shill, it cant be all can it!!? no a mound of mess, some metal in it, really? shill?? really? im...im totally sold her arent i?? 9/1 was still an inside job, u cant answer the simplest of questions can u shill?

[MJB919]

@wellifthemediasaysit Did you even read the links I sent you? The engine on the picture is a Pratt Whitney PW200 which only a 757 carries.

The small 12ft hole was caused by the landing gear, the larger hole was 75ft wide caused by the fuselage. One of the wings hit the ground while the other was sheared off on impact.

I'm sending you the link which explains the DNA evidence.

[wellifthemediasaysit]

@MJB919 what DNA??? blood? skin? bone? which one please, and provide evidence of this, something other than 'dna was found'!!! and where are those giant 9 ft engines, i see a 3 ft piece of metal that could be anything, anywhere, and the cctv? and the tiny hole made by this giant airliner?? stupid paid cointelpro shill, why do u run??? answer these questions or i keep asking them...

[MJB919]

@wellifthemediasaysit The funny thing is that you still have yet to present a legitimate argument which proves that you clearly have none. The pictures do contain a landing gear and an engine and yet you can't even explain it.

Yes DNA was recovered at the scene, that is how the passangers were identified. DNA is very hard to destroy and it can be covered from burned human remains. Because you are clearly very poorly educated you wouldn't know this.

[wellifthemediasaysit]

@MJB919 what? i looked at those links, its the same old BS, a total mess of god knows what!! how the fuck is that 'pwoof' of anything'?? passengers??how can they have been here if no airliner hit the pentagon?? DNA? proof it! 184 different samples of blood, somehow remain uncontaminated, and matched almost instantly? even the highjackers, who 'werent known' and 'may have stolen IDs'??? really shill? you truly suck at disinfo, but cointelpro only get what they pay for i guess!!

[MJB919]

@llanbo I had no idea getting such a job would be this easy lol.